Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1590/s2236-89062012000400004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criptógamos do Parque Estadual das Fontes do Ipiranga, São Paulo, SP, Brasil: Pteridophyta: 7. Dryopteridaceae e 11. Lomariopsidaceae

Abstract: -(Cryptogams of Parque Estadual das Fontes do Ipiranga, São Paulo, São Paulo State, Brazil. Pteridophyta: 7. Dryopteridaceae and 11. Lomariopsidaceae). The data of the floristic survey of the families Dryopteridaceae and Lomariopsidaceae in Parque Estadual das Fontes do Ipiranga (PEFI) are presented. Five genera and nine species were found in the area. Dryopteridaceae is represented by two genera (Polybotrya and Rumohra) and four species: Polybotrya cylindrica Kaulf., P. semipinnata Fée, P. speciosa Schott, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Moran (1987), Polybotrya occurs preferably in shaded areas in mature forests, rarely growing in disturbed sites. In Brazil, P. cylindrica is mainly found inside mature Atlantic forest formations (Canestraro and Labiak 2015), being less common along trail margins (Hirai and Prado 2012) and in restinga (Nóbrega et al 2011;Gonzatti et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Moran (1987), Polybotrya occurs preferably in shaded areas in mature forests, rarely growing in disturbed sites. In Brazil, P. cylindrica is mainly found inside mature Atlantic forest formations (Canestraro and Labiak 2015), being less common along trail margins (Hirai and Prado 2012) and in restinga (Nóbrega et al 2011;Gonzatti et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%