2014
DOI: 10.1590/s2179-975x2014000100011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytoplankton functional and morphological groups as indicators of environmental variability in a lateral channel of the Upper Paraná River floodplain

Abstract: AIM: Models of phytoplankton functional classification based on functional (FGs) and morphological (MBFGs) traits can be an important tool in aquatic monitoring. In this long-term study on phytoplankton, the goal was to use these two approaches to explain the changes in this community in an active channel of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, depending on the environmental conditions imposed by the hydrosedimentological regime. METHODS: Samples were taken between 2000 and 2013. RESULTS: 196 taxa were identifie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have evaluated the deficiencies and the benefits of the functional group approach comparing, among others, MFG and MBFG in different types of freshwater ecosystems (Litchman et al, 2010;Izaguirre et al, 2012;Abonyi et al, 2014;Bortolini et al, 2014;Salmaso et al, 2015;Rodríguez-Flores, 2017). Some authors have stated that whereas the MFG approach can explain phytoplankton dynamics in relation to environmental variables (regional and temporal scales), the MBFG can better explain large-scale variations (Salmaso et al, 2015 and cites therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have evaluated the deficiencies and the benefits of the functional group approach comparing, among others, MFG and MBFG in different types of freshwater ecosystems (Litchman et al, 2010;Izaguirre et al, 2012;Abonyi et al, 2014;Bortolini et al, 2014;Salmaso et al, 2015;Rodríguez-Flores, 2017). Some authors have stated that whereas the MFG approach can explain phytoplankton dynamics in relation to environmental variables (regional and temporal scales), the MBFG can better explain large-scale variations (Salmaso et al, 2015 and cites therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Coqueiro lake, the variability in phytoplankton composition and biomass was mainly related to seasonal changes in the water level, with greatest biomass and highest species richness at the low water period and lowest at the high water period, after establishing connectivity with the main river and raised water in the lake. The inverse relationship between phytoplanktonic biomass and water level elevation has been widely documented for floodplain lakes of the Paraná (Bortolini et al 2014), Amazon (Lobo et al 2018), Paraguay (Oliveira & Calheiros 2000) and temperate regions (Kasten 2003, Schemel et al 2004.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, the FGs indicators of the trophic state that we registered were organisms mostly associated with lentic conditions. Moreover, lakes present large water-retention time that favors the establishment and development of phytoplankters and could explain why more FGs were related to lakes than to rivers (Margalef, 1978;Bortolini et al, 2014;Török et al, 2016;Moresco et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoplankton FGs are sensitivity to environmental variation, hence efficient to predict environmental conditions Nabout et al, 2006;Becker et al, 2009;Bovo-Scomparin et al, 2013;Crossetti et al, 2013;Bortolini et al, 2014). This study aimed to verify the efficacy of phytoplankton FGs as indicators of environmental conditions in floodplain and the effects of the connectivity of the environments to the main river on phytoplankton variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%