2016
DOI: 10.1590/s2179-975x0116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periphyton biomass accrual rate changes over the colonization process in a shallow mesotrophic reservoir

Abstract: Aim: We identified and analyzed the developmental phases (exponential and loss) of periphyton on artificial substrates based on biomass accrual rate in dry and rainy seasons in a shallow mesotrophic reservoir (Ninfeias Reservoir, Parque Estadual das Fontes do Ipiranga, São Paulo, Brazil). We evaluated the colonization time required for the developmental phase to change, as well as related limnological variables. Methods Samplings were carried out weekly, totaling 98 days of substrates exposure. We analyzed th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Summer showed the highest accumulated rainfall (326.9 mm) during the sampling period and the lowest species number in both substrates. High rainfall lead to the detachment of the periphyton from the substrates (Casartelli et al 2016), which certainly contributed to the less number of species registered in Piraquara I. We registered nine diatom species (Spicaticribra kingstonii, Eunotia intermedia, Eunotia parasiolii, Eunotia pseudoimplicata, Encyonopsis subminuta, Cymbopleura naviculiformis, Planothidium incuriatum, Capartogramma crucicula and Nitzschia nana) that occurred in spring on both substrates, but were not recorded in summer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Summer showed the highest accumulated rainfall (326.9 mm) during the sampling period and the lowest species number in both substrates. High rainfall lead to the detachment of the periphyton from the substrates (Casartelli et al 2016), which certainly contributed to the less number of species registered in Piraquara I. We registered nine diatom species (Spicaticribra kingstonii, Eunotia intermedia, Eunotia parasiolii, Eunotia pseudoimplicata, Encyonopsis subminuta, Cymbopleura naviculiformis, Planothidium incuriatum, Capartogramma crucicula and Nitzschia nana) that occurred in spring on both substrates, but were not recorded in summer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the exponential growth phase generally occurs within the accepted colonization time of 28−35 days, it is the availability of light and nutrients that controls the accrual phase pattern (Biggs, 1996). This was observed by Casartelli et al (2016) where higher chl-a concentrations on glass slides in a shallow mesotrophic reservoir during the dry season, in comparison to the wet season, due to high total nitrogen concentrations, water transparency and low rainfall was shown. Since the artificial structure holding the glass slides used during this study was suspended just below the water surface, light was not a limiting growth factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Slides were collected every week, at random positions, to assess the recruitment and colonisation by epilithic diatoms. The optimal colonisation time for maximum epilithic biomass development in freshwater systems is estimated at 2 to 4 weeks (Dalu et al, 2014;Casartelli et al, 2016), while in marine systems it is estimated at 5 weeks (Desrosiers et al, 2014). However, in a nutrient-enriched permanently open estuarine system the artificial substrata were found colonized by macroalgae before reaching the 30-day deployment period (Minne, 2003).…”
Section: Artificial Substratamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The artificial substrate exposure time for periphyton colonization was 30 days at sampling sites. This exposure time was chosen because periphytic biomass accumulation is high at this colonization time in the studied reservoir (Casartelli et al, 2016), allowing a better comparison with the periphyton on artificial substrate and Utricularia. The stem and modified leaves of U. foliosa L were sampled.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%