2012
DOI: 10.1590/s2176-94512012000400019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of sucking habits on occlusion development in the first 36 months

Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the influence of sucking habits on the occlusal characteristics of the deciduous dentition. Methods:The initial sample consisted of 86 infants, aged 0 to 3 months. Seven home visits were performed, when and information on breastfeeding practice, nutritive and non-nutritive sucking habits, mouth breathing and dentition development was collected. From the first sample, impressions of the dental arches were obtained from 58 children at the age of 36 months (+… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this meta-analysis included only observational studies, which have lower evidence levels than randomized clinical trials (Burns, Rohrich, & Chung, 2011; GRADE Working Group, 2004). Only a few cohort studies (de Morais, Mota, & Amorim, 2014; dos Santos Neto, Oliveira, Barbosa, Zandonade, & Oliveira, 2012; Karjalainen, Rönning, Lapinleimu, & Simell, 1999; Lescano de Ferrer & Varela de Villalba, 2006; Moimaz et al, 2014; Warren & Bishara, 2002) and study designs nested within cohorts (Caramez da Silva et al, 2012; Peres et al, 2007; Peres, Cascaes, Peres, et al, 2015; Viggiano et al, 2004), which are considered more robust than cross-sectional studies, were identified (Burns et al, 2011; GRADE Working Group, 2004). Furthermore, three such studies were not included in our quantitative synthesis due to a lack of raw data (dos Santos Neto et al, 2012; Karjalainen et al, 1999; Peres, Cascaes, Peres, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this meta-analysis included only observational studies, which have lower evidence levels than randomized clinical trials (Burns, Rohrich, & Chung, 2011; GRADE Working Group, 2004). Only a few cohort studies (de Morais, Mota, & Amorim, 2014; dos Santos Neto, Oliveira, Barbosa, Zandonade, & Oliveira, 2012; Karjalainen, Rönning, Lapinleimu, & Simell, 1999; Lescano de Ferrer & Varela de Villalba, 2006; Moimaz et al, 2014; Warren & Bishara, 2002) and study designs nested within cohorts (Caramez da Silva et al, 2012; Peres et al, 2007; Peres, Cascaes, Peres, et al, 2015; Viggiano et al, 2004), which are considered more robust than cross-sectional studies, were identified (Burns et al, 2011; GRADE Working Group, 2004). Furthermore, three such studies were not included in our quantitative synthesis due to a lack of raw data (dos Santos Neto et al, 2012; Karjalainen et al, 1999; Peres, Cascaes, Peres, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] Genetic factors, long-term environmental factors, sucking habits, and other parafunctional habits influence the final form of the tooth. [34] Development of teeth is a long-term, progressive process which occurs as a result of molecular and cellular interactions. It has critical stages of development which can be influenced by genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occlusal characteristics of the primary teeth can also be influenced by sucking habits and parafunctional habits like bruxism. [4] The variations in tooth form and groove pattern are frequently encountered which can be studied by measurements. [5] Variations in the occlusal surfaces of the mandibular molars are based on the study by Gregory and Hellman.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harmful oral habits, such as thumb sucking or the use of pacifiers and bottles, are learned and often repeated patterns of muscle contraction (14) and may cause damage to the morphophysiology of the stomatognathic system (7)(8)(9) . Among these, the most common are malocclusion (15)(16)(17) , bruxism (18,19) , and difficulties in lip sealing, suggesting changes in the orofacial muscles (9,17) . In addition, harmful oral habits are risk factors for mouth breathing and changes in chewing and swallowing (17,20,21) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, the most common are malocclusion (15)(16)(17) , bruxism (18,19) , and difficulties in lip sealing, suggesting changes in the orofacial muscles (9,17) . In addition, harmful oral habits are risk factors for mouth breathing and changes in chewing and swallowing (17,20,21) . The severity of the changes found is directly related to the frequency, duration, and intensity of the habit (22) , as well as the individual predisposition, conditioned by genetic factors (23) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%