Gluteoplastia de aumento: experiência do Serviço de Cirurgia Plástica Dr. Ewaldo Bolivar de Souza Pinto

Abstract

Background: The buttocks are formed by muscles responsible for leg movement, the largest being the gluteus maximus. Moreover, the buttocks have secondary sexual function: they are an erogenous area and a symbol of fertility, and are employed in advertising for male-oriented consumer products. Women with bigger buttocks arouse greater attraction and sexual desire, which has driven the demand for augmentation gluteoplasty with silicone implants. This study analyzed the authors' experience with the XYZ augmentation gluteoplasty technique by comparing the rates of complications related to the procedure between gluteoplasty + back and flank liposuction, and gluteoplasty alone. Methods: A total of 8 women were subjected to XYZ augmentation gluteoplasty between July and November 2011. The patients were divided into 2 groups with 4 members each. In groups 1 and 2, gluteoplasty with and without liposuction of the back and flanks was performed, respectively. Results: Four, 2, and 2 pairs of 400-, 350-, and 300-mL Quartzo ® implants were used, respectively. The total incidence of seroma, necrosis of the edges, and wound dehiscence was 50% (4 cases in total) in both groups. Conclusions: XYZ augmentation gluteoplasty with silicone implants produces natural and long-lasting results with low complication rates when not combined with liposuction.

Uso De Fatores De Crescimento Na Prevenção De Complicações Pós-Operatória De Cirurgias Plásticas – Uma Revisão Para Um Capítulo

“…As complicações e intercorrências mais frequentes são a dor, deiscência da ferida, seroma, fibrose e infecção. 6,7 Vergara, Amezcua 8 relataram suas experiências na realização de aumento glúteo pela técnica intramuscular em 160 casos ao longo de 15 anos, onde ocorreram complicações em 16 ou seja (10%) dos 160 pacientes, seroma apresentado em 7 (4%), assimetria em 4 (2,66%), contratura capsular em 3 (2%), hipercorreção em 1 (0,66%), e ruptura do implante em 1 (0,66%).…”

Analysis of 4725 Cases of Gluteal Augmentation with Intramuscular Fillers: A Clinical Cohort Study

“…It is widely adopted by the medical community, being used for bone reconstitution and corrections in neurosurgery, ophthalmology, and traumatology mainly due to its biocompatibility, stability at the application site, and low risk of complications and migration. 1,[5][6][7] It is well known that PMMA microsphere filling results in tissue growth by the body itself. The dramatic increase in product quality in recent years has directly influenced the decreasing complication rates.…”

“…It is widely adopted by the medical community, being used for bone reconstitution and corrections in neurosurgery, ophthalmology, and traumatology mainly due to its biocompatibility, stability at the application site, and low risk of complications and migration. 1 , 5 – 7 …”

“Intramuscular gluteoplasty: a comparative study between different incisional access.”

“…1 There is a consensus among plastic surgeons that the best plane for placing the implants is the intramuscular plane. 2 There are, in fact, four planes for placing gluteal implants, namely the subcutaneous, subfascial, intramuscular, and submuscular planes. Studies have shown that the intramuscular plane has the lowest rate of complications.…”