2022
DOI: 10.1590/s1983-41952022000400004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of cementitious matrices self-healing with bacillus bacteria

Abstract: Bacterial solutions have been studied to promote self-healing of cementitious matrices, however, the concentration of this solutions varied between studies. Consequently, the objective of this study was to evaluate the self-healing potential of different concentrations of Bacillus subtilis AP91 encapsulated in expanded perlite (EP). Visual examination and capillary absorption of water was measured over time. Test samples were also subjected to strength resistance tests. The physiochemical properties of EP and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, in this study, if a crack appeared along a region of smaller particles, there was a chance that the substitute aggregate did not fracture and sodium metasilicate was not exposed to humidity. Those results of cicatrization occurrence being affected by the crack area, the surface characteristics, and the healing product availability were also pointed out by Pacheco et al [34] and Muller et al [47]. Overall, EP substitution achieved between 57.58% and 100% healing of the crack while EC substitution achieved between 12.63% and 90% healing.…”
Section: Visual Analysismentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Consequently, in this study, if a crack appeared along a region of smaller particles, there was a chance that the substitute aggregate did not fracture and sodium metasilicate was not exposed to humidity. Those results of cicatrization occurrence being affected by the crack area, the surface characteristics, and the healing product availability were also pointed out by Pacheco et al [34] and Muller et al [47]. Overall, EP substitution achieved between 57.58% and 100% healing of the crack while EC substitution achieved between 12.63% and 90% healing.…”
Section: Visual Analysismentioning
confidence: 59%