2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-56762014000600009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sclerotia morphology traits and mycelial growth rate are not informative variables for population studies of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum

Abstract: The usefulness of sclerotia morphology traits and mycelial growth rate to infer phenotypic variability in populations of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum associated with common beans in Minas Gerais State (MG) was assessed in two experiments. Isolates (131) were collected in the Northwestern, Alto Paranaíba, Zona da Mata and Southern regions of MG and the mycelial growth rate, the number, weight and dimensions (length, width and thickness) of sclerotia and mycelial pigmentation were assessed. There was a high variabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on the relationships between white mould incidence and sclerotial production under field conditions are scarce. Studies conducted in vitro for evaluating isolate variability in sclerotial production (Li et al ., ; Lehner et al ., ) may be of limited value to extrapolate to field conditions. Hoffman et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies on the relationships between white mould incidence and sclerotial production under field conditions are scarce. Studies conducted in vitro for evaluating isolate variability in sclerotial production (Li et al ., ; Lehner et al ., ) may be of limited value to extrapolate to field conditions. Hoffman et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the relationships between white mould incidence and sclerotial production under field conditions are scarce. Studies conducted in vitro for evaluating isolate variability in sclerotial production (Li et al, 2008;Lehner et al, 2014) may be of limited value to extrapolate to field conditions. Hoffman et al (1998) estimated the number of sclerotia per 300 g of seed across five soybean cultivars, but the disease incidence-sclerotial production relationship was not investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colony diameter was assessed in two different ways every 24h by digital pachymeter by orthogonal dimension and by two perpendicular dimensions. Results were converted to AMG (mm h −1 ) according to LEHNER et al (2014) and MGI according to the adapted formula described by MAGUIRE (1962). Isolates with AMG values ≥60.0mm were assigned as the highest-myceliumgrowth group at the end of the evaluation time.…”
Section: Colonies and Conidia Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in sclerotia number and size among isolates of S. rolfsii have been reported (Le et al 2012;Narayan et al 2017;Xie et al 2014). In a related study, Lehner et al (2014) observed variation in the number of sclerotia produced by isolates in two different experiments using a related fungal species (S. sclerotiorum). Although Lehner et al (2014) and Li et al (2008) found no correlation between mycelial growth rate and the number of sclerotia produced by isolates of S. sclerotiorum, we found that these factors were negatively correlated for isolates of S. rolfsii.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Morphological and phenotypic diversity of pathogens may be related to variation in virulence that is important in the selection of pathogen isolates used for the evaluation of disease resistance in crop breeding programs. Variability among S. rolfsii isolates and related species such as S. sclerotiorum that infect different crops has been investigated in studies relating to sclerotia morphology traits and mycelial growth rates (Lehner et al 2014;Narayan et al 2017;Vleugels et al 2013), pathogenicity in susceptible host plants, and genetics using molecular markers (Jebaraj et al 2017;Narayan et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%