2017
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-21702017000300030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Tool to Evaluate the Sample Size in Map Positional Accuracy

Abstract: Abstract:In many countries, the positional accuracy control by points in Cartography or Spatial data corresponds to the comparison between sets of coordinates of well-defined points in relation to the same set of points from a more accurate source. Usually, each country determines a maximum number of points which could present error values above a pre-established threshold. In many cases, the standards define the sample size as 20 points, with no more consideration, and fix this threshold in 10% of the sample.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
5
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…With the recent evolution of digital cartography and the geothecnology's resources, new products require other quality parameters, including a refinement of the assessment for positional accuracy assessment (Ariza-López et. al, 2007) and computational programs to perform it (Nero et. al, 2017).…”
Section: Absolute Versus Relative Positional Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the recent evolution of digital cartography and the geothecnology's resources, new products require other quality parameters, including a refinement of the assessment for positional accuracy assessment (Ariza-López et. al, 2007) and computational programs to perform it (Nero et. al, 2017).…”
Section: Absolute Versus Relative Positional Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of object-points of building structures using the method presented in this work, also contributes to the study and quality control of topographic surveys performed with drones as well as control of the Digital Surface Model obtained with LiDAR data in urban environments. In these cases, a methodology for evaluating both planimetric and altimetric accuracy is discussed in Cintra & Nero (2015), Nero et al (2017), França & Silva (2018 and França et al (2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As feições lineares de teste, deste estudo, são os perímetros de cada região circular que representa as áreas de pivô central identificados pela transformada de Hough, e as feições lineares de referência são os perímetros homólogos apresentados por ANA (2014).…”
Section: Classeunclassified
“…Essa avaliação da acurácia posicional de dados cartográficos tradicionalmente é realizada por meio de técnicas baseadas em feições pontuais (NERO et al, 2017;ARIZA-LÓPEZ, RODRÍGUEZ-AVI;ALBA-FERNÁNDEZ, 2018;CUNHA et al, 2019), como é preconizado pelo padrão brasileiro (Decreto n° 89.817/ET-CQDG). Na avaliação por meio de pontos é realizada a comparação estatística entre as coordenadas obtidas no produto avaliado e as coordenadas homólogas, obtidas em uma fonte mais precisa.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified