Monitoring the training intensity and recovery with a psychometrics approach: a gender comparison with young athletes

Cruz, Ramón; Alves, Danilo L.; Azevedo, Rafael Cordeiro; Bertuzzi, Rômulo Cássio de Moraes; De-Oliveira, Fernando Roberto; Lima, Jorge Roberto Perrout de

doi:10.1590/s1980-6574201700030024

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 11 publications

(19 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionaly, the BM based PPMS (%) to boys was 94.26 ± 4.18 and to girls 98.00 ± 1.49. Further descriptive characteristics has been described in detail previously 8 . The table 2 presents the SP tests of participants.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The percentage of PMS (PPMS) it is obtained by the following equation, PPMS = 100*(Current Height/PMS). Besides that, this method has been largely used to estimate the biological maturity 8,20,21 .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this way, there are several studies demonstrating the scientific validity and practical application of this method 1,[5][6][7] . To track and field, we already demonstrated that girls have more RPE-training sessions than boys to running trainingsessions (endurance and resistance of speed) 8 . Collectively, these studies have suggested that RPE-training session is sensitive enough to indicate how the athletes perceive the training intensity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our previous study shown that for training of 250 and 1000-meters females related higher RPE-values than males, and this difference persisted even when biological maturity effect was controlled. Taken together, besides the understanding established previously about how girls and boys could perceived different the track and field trainingsession 8 ; it is necessary to clarify if BM and track and field performance can modulate the perception about training-session.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Do biological maturity and performance influence the training load of track and field athletes?

Cruz

Alves

Domingos

et al. 2019

Rev. bras. cineantropom. desempenho hum.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is necessary to clarify if BM and track and field performance can modulate the perception about RPE-session. The purpose of the present study was to verify if biological maturity and track and field-specific performance can be associated with training load (RPE-session method). Seventy-five young athletes (13-15 years old) of both genders participated in the present study. The experimental protocol lasted seven consecutive days. Performance tests (75-m running, long jump, 250-m running, shot put and 1000-m running) were made on the first day. After 48 hours, five days of track and field training it was prescribed, each day represents a training of each performance test. All training sessions had the same duration (120 min). The value of the training load was obtained multiplying the RPE value with training session duration (in minutes). For girls, the training load of 250-m training was correlated with biological maturity (r = -0.36, p = 0.02, n = 37) and specific performance (r = 0.33, p = 0.04, n = 37). All other analyzes indicate that biological maturity and track and field-specific performance do not influence the training load based on RPE-session method. Training load based on RPE-session is not influenced by biological maturity and track and field-specific performance, therefore can be used to control the training load of young track and field athletes. To girls it is necessary a care to control the training sessions intensity of 250-m running.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%