2015
DOI: 10.1590/s1980-65742015000300001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in aiming movements and its association to hand function

Abstract: Abstract--The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of the uncertainty of target location on the planning and execution of aiming movements performed towards the ipsilateral and contralateral directions by the right and left upper limbs. In addition, the association between the performance of aiming movements and the performance of functional manual tasks was investigated. Two tasks were proposed: with prior knowledge of the movement direction (simple reaction time) or not (choice reaction time). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculated the average of the trials for each variable for each individual and then the Shapiro-Wilk test and histogram analysis were applied to verify the data’s normality. Only the contralateral direction trials were analyzed since differences in the movement performance related to movement directions had already been well-established in the literature (de Paiva Silva et al, 2014, 2015, 2018; Galloway & Koshland, 2002; Ishihara et al, 2002). The contralateral direction was considered more challenging for both movement planning and execution, making it possible to discriminate groups of individuals concerning their ability to perform the aiming movement at different stages of recovery as well as motor degrees of impairment (de Paiva Silva et al, 2014, 2015, 2018; Galloway & Koshland, 2002; Ishihara et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the average of the trials for each variable for each individual and then the Shapiro-Wilk test and histogram analysis were applied to verify the data’s normality. Only the contralateral direction trials were analyzed since differences in the movement performance related to movement directions had already been well-established in the literature (de Paiva Silva et al, 2014, 2015, 2018; Galloway & Koshland, 2002; Ishihara et al, 2002). The contralateral direction was considered more challenging for both movement planning and execution, making it possible to discriminate groups of individuals concerning their ability to perform the aiming movement at different stages of recovery as well as motor degrees of impairment (de Paiva Silva et al, 2014, 2015, 2018; Galloway & Koshland, 2002; Ishihara et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beginning and end of the movement were defined as the instant when the resulting linear velocity reached 5% of the maximum value before (beginning of the acceleration phase) and after (end of the acceleration phase) the velocity peak. Motor planning and execution variables were analyzed as described in previous studies (Carvalho et al, 2020; Coqueiro et al, 2014; Giangiardi et al, 2017; Silva et al, 2015). For motor planning, we used Reaction Time (RT) and Initial Direction Error (IDE).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%