2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1980-65742013000300014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equal prefrontal cortex activation between males and females in a motor tasks and different visual imagery perspectives: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study

Abstract: Abstract-The purpose of this study was to compare the prefrontal cortex (PFC) blood flow variation and time on in males and females while performing a motor task and imagery perspectives. Eighteen right handed subjects (11 males and 7 females) were volunteers to this study. All subjects went through three randomly conditions, a motor task condition (MT) in which they had to do a simple finger tap. The other conditions included practicing imagery in first and third views. During all the conditions, the fNIRS de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are certain elements of this study that could be considered limitations, such as the lack of uniformity in the participants' imagination levels, with great variation in players' imagery, in terms of color, sound and perspective. This could mean that the single IMA group was actually made up of heterogenous subsets, although one recent study has shown that the perspective adopted does not appear to make any difference to motor imagery results 29 In other words, in the present study each participant was given instructions and performed motor imagery in their own way, so they were controlled, but not manipulated, as was the case in a study by Guillot et al 2 . The ideal approach would probably be to subdivide participants on the basis of their imagery levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…There are certain elements of this study that could be considered limitations, such as the lack of uniformity in the participants' imagination levels, with great variation in players' imagery, in terms of color, sound and perspective. This could mean that the single IMA group was actually made up of heterogenous subsets, although one recent study has shown that the perspective adopted does not appear to make any difference to motor imagery results 29 In other words, in the present study each participant was given instructions and performed motor imagery in their own way, so they were controlled, but not manipulated, as was the case in a study by Guillot et al 2 . The ideal approach would probably be to subdivide participants on the basis of their imagery levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…3,8,33 This task was included since it has been shown that the PFC is also affected by motor imagery. 63,64 Rest (Rest)…”
Section: Task Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%