2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1980-57642010dn40100001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of journals in the QUALIS System of CAPES - URGENT need of changing the criteria!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although with a presumably good goal in mind, Brazilian Qualis and other systems that rely on JIF for assessing science are not effective measures of a scientist quality and may cause more harm than good for the development of science itself (ABN, 2010;Ferreira et al, 2013). The use of JIF is so negative for science that a recent international declaration on research assessment (DORA) signed by universities and scholars around the world urged academic institutions to stop using JIF "[…] as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist's contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions" (DORA, 2012).…”
Section: The Need To Change a Broken Evaluation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although with a presumably good goal in mind, Brazilian Qualis and other systems that rely on JIF for assessing science are not effective measures of a scientist quality and may cause more harm than good for the development of science itself (ABN, 2010;Ferreira et al, 2013). The use of JIF is so negative for science that a recent international declaration on research assessment (DORA) signed by universities and scholars around the world urged academic institutions to stop using JIF "[…] as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist's contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions" (DORA, 2012).…”
Section: The Need To Change a Broken Evaluation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%