2016
DOI: 10.1590/s1980-5764-2016dn1004010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster analysis of cognitive performance in a sample of patients with Parkinson's disease

Abstract: BackgroundCognitive impairment is a common feature of Parkinson's disease (PD). The diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in patients with PD implies an increased risk for later development of dementia, however, it is unclear whether a specific type of cognitive loss confers increased risk for faster cognitive decline.ObjectiveDetermine whether it was possible to identify distinct cognitive phenotypes in a sample of patients with PD.MethodsA cross-sectional evaluation of 100 patients with PD recruited f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of subjective "memory" complaint is derived from amnestic MCI as this subtype has been regarded as pre-dementia status [26]. Moreover, de cits in memory, which count among the most sensitive cognitive markers for early recognition of AD [27]. However, there were notable differences between AD-MCI vs PD-MCI [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of subjective "memory" complaint is derived from amnestic MCI as this subtype has been regarded as pre-dementia status [26]. Moreover, de cits in memory, which count among the most sensitive cognitive markers for early recognition of AD [27]. However, there were notable differences between AD-MCI vs PD-MCI [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domains were first compared across subdiagnoses of this cognitively normal ET sample including those diagnosed with fully normal cognition (group 1, fully normal cognition) and those labeled as having test impairment of unlikely clinical significance, test impairment of possible clinical significance, and questionable/isolated functional impairment (group 2, not-fully normal cognition) using 2-sample t-tests. K-means cluster analysis was then performed (Chiu, Douglas, & Li, 2009;Souza, Oliveira, Foss, & Tumas, 2016;Szeto et al, 2015) to identify the extent to which a set of specific cognitive profiles best described the overall sample, and bar graphs were generated, using SPSS 24. Analysis was performed at a range of cluster numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All 22 of the reviewed studies were of moderate to high quality (quality range: 5-8, Supplementary Material 2). Nine studies defined subtypes based on impairment severity [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], and 11 studies revealed subtypes based on domains of impairment [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Two longitudinal studies were identified (Table 3) [28,29].…”
Section: Re Sultsmentioning
confidence: 99%