2017
DOI: 10.1590/s1980-220x2016046603234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual volume in vials of antibiotics used in pediatrics

Abstract: Objective: Quantifying residual volume contained in vials of antibiotics used in pediatrics. Method: This is an experiment involving samples from vials of antibiotics used in a pediatric hospital. Residual volume was identified by calculating the difference in weight measurement before and after the vials were washed. Evaluation of the residual volume difference in the vials was determined by the Wilcoxon non-parametric test for a sample and established at a significance level of 5%. Results: 105 samples of an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They observed that oxacillin (88.57%) and ceftriaxone (94.28%) were mostly used correctly, with low residual values. This did not occur with benzylpenicillin procaine + potassium, because, in 74.28% of the vials, there was discarding of a residual volume higher than that recommended 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They observed that oxacillin (88.57%) and ceftriaxone (94.28%) were mostly used correctly, with low residual values. This did not occur with benzylpenicillin procaine + potassium, because, in 74.28% of the vials, there was discarding of a residual volume higher than that recommended 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Observaram que predominou o correto aproveitamento dos antibióticos oxacilina (88,57%) e ceftriaxona (94,28%), com baixos valores residuais. O mesmo não ocorreu com a benzilpenicilina procaína + potássica, pois, em 74,28% dos frascos, houve descarte de volume residual superior ao recomendado 23 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified