2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1808-86942011000200015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of gender on the vestibular evoked myogenic potential

Abstract: There is no consensus on the relevance of factors that influence gender differences in the behavior of muscles. Some studies have reported a relationship between muscle tension and amplitude of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential; others, that results depend on which muscles are studied or on how much load is applied. Aims:This study aims to compare vestibular evoked myogenic potential parameters between genders in young individuals.Methods: eighty young adults were selected -40 men and 40 women. Stimuli … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the functional significance of the sex differences in VOR found in this study is unclear. Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing in a population of young adults showed no sex differences in response latency or amplitude (33). Future studies will be needed to more firmly establish any sex differences in vestibular function, as they are clearly known to exist for auditory function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the functional significance of the sex differences in VOR found in this study is unclear. Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing in a population of young adults showed no sex differences in response latency or amplitude (33). Future studies will be needed to more firmly establish any sex differences in vestibular function, as they are clearly known to exist for auditory function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The n23 latencies were about 24 ms [26]. The latency of p13 for the right ear stood at 14.13 ms (±1.39) in women and 14.15 ms (±1.21) in men, and for the left ear, it was 14.14 ms (±1.42) in women and 14.35 ms (±1.41) in men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The cVEMP waveform corresponds to a compound and averaged myogenic response (known as p13–n23 or P1–N1 response), which can be evoked by high intensity sounds or vibrations (34). The amplitude of cVEMPs is reduced with aging (35, 36) but are unaffected by gender (37). This evoked response has become a clinical standard for otolith (saccular) testing, used in a variety of vestibular disorders (34, 3841).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%