2016
DOI: 10.1590/s1808-185120161501153510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evaluation on the Effect of Screw Density in the Correction

Abstract: Objective: The objective was to investigate implant density or the number of screws correlated with the correction of the main curve in patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: We evaluated 112 medical records: 33 patients with screw density of up to 50%, and 79 patients with a density of 100%; all patients underwent surgical correction by posterior approach with transpedicular fixation. Results: In the group of patients with screw density of up to 50% the residual C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the mean preoperative Cobb was 51.8°, ranging from 40° to 81°, while mean postoperative Cobb was 8°, ranging from 3° to 25°, with significant decrease in Cobb immediate and 1 year postoperatively when compared to preoperative level (p < 0.001 for both). Similar results were reported by Garcia et al (10) who included 79 patients and there was a statistically significant difference in the postoperative Cobb angle as compared to the preoperative Cobb angle (7° vs 53°) respectively. The results of the current study also agree with Kilinc et al (11) who showed that the preoperative mean main thoracic Cobb angle measured 61.2° and corrected to 25.3° postoperatively, and was 28.5° at 2-year follow-up.…”
Section: Radiological Outcomessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, the mean preoperative Cobb was 51.8°, ranging from 40° to 81°, while mean postoperative Cobb was 8°, ranging from 3° to 25°, with significant decrease in Cobb immediate and 1 year postoperatively when compared to preoperative level (p < 0.001 for both). Similar results were reported by Garcia et al (10) who included 79 patients and there was a statistically significant difference in the postoperative Cobb angle as compared to the preoperative Cobb angle (7° vs 53°) respectively. The results of the current study also agree with Kilinc et al (11) who showed that the preoperative mean main thoracic Cobb angle measured 61.2° and corrected to 25.3° postoperatively, and was 28.5° at 2-year follow-up.…”
Section: Radiological Outcomessupporting
confidence: 89%