2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1807-76922007000200006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of imagery in studies of the change process

Abstract: This article aims to demonstrate the analytical power of the imagery concept for an organizational analysis. The gaps in organizational studies justify building new reference pictures in the organizational culture, with imagery as a starting point, considering subjectivity as an object of the phenomenology investigation and imagery as an object of anthropology and sociology. The analytical perspective follows the sociology of the knowledge and, in this context, applications of anthropology, general sociology, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most comprehensive methodology for understanding how myths operate is the mythanalysis of Gilbert Durand. The potential interest of Durand’s work for the management field has already been suggested (Grimand, 2009; Grzybovski, Amâncio, & Paço-Cunha, 2007; Paula-Carvalho, 1992; Tannery, 2009), but there are only a few and relatively recent examples of its use (see Blanco-Gracia, 2014; Guelfand, 2015; Robert-Demontrond & Özçağlar-Toulouse, 2011), and its actual rich possibilities have not yet been explored. Due to space restrictions, I am presenting a simplified, yet operative version of Durand’s mythanalysis in this article.…”
Section: Thinking Through Mythsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most comprehensive methodology for understanding how myths operate is the mythanalysis of Gilbert Durand. The potential interest of Durand’s work for the management field has already been suggested (Grimand, 2009; Grzybovski, Amâncio, & Paço-Cunha, 2007; Paula-Carvalho, 1992; Tannery, 2009), but there are only a few and relatively recent examples of its use (see Blanco-Gracia, 2014; Guelfand, 2015; Robert-Demontrond & Özçağlar-Toulouse, 2011), and its actual rich possibilities have not yet been explored. Due to space restrictions, I am presenting a simplified, yet operative version of Durand’s mythanalysis in this article.…”
Section: Thinking Through Mythsmentioning
confidence: 99%