2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000100028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IDH1 mutations in a Brazilian series of Glioblastoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, we found IDH1 mutations in 18.7% (6/32) of samples tested, while none of the cases demonstrated any mutation in IDH2. The frequency of IDH1 mutations in our cohort was similar to that from Netherlands (20%, 23/113) (Bleeker et al, 2009) and Germany (19%, 50/262) (Felsberg et al, 2010), higher than Brazil (11.8%, 19/161) (Uno et al, 2011), and lower than USA (45.3%, 34/75) (Horbinski et al, 2009), Japan (29%, 73/250) (Musaka et al, 2012) as well as India (46%, 46/100) (Jha et al, 2011). The difference in the frequency of IDH1 mutation may be attributed to sample size, variable sensitivity of the detection assays, or the racial differences can also be taken into consideration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, we found IDH1 mutations in 18.7% (6/32) of samples tested, while none of the cases demonstrated any mutation in IDH2. The frequency of IDH1 mutations in our cohort was similar to that from Netherlands (20%, 23/113) (Bleeker et al, 2009) and Germany (19%, 50/262) (Felsberg et al, 2010), higher than Brazil (11.8%, 19/161) (Uno et al, 2011), and lower than USA (45.3%, 34/75) (Horbinski et al, 2009), Japan (29%, 73/250) (Musaka et al, 2012) as well as India (46%, 46/100) (Jha et al, 2011). The difference in the frequency of IDH1 mutation may be attributed to sample size, variable sensitivity of the detection assays, or the racial differences can also be taken into consideration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In this context, identification of mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1/ IDH2) either in the R132 or R172 residues were recently highlighted, and has already become a molecular marker of significant diagnostic and prognostic relevance in the assessment of human gliomas (Parsons et al, 2008;Yan et al, 2009). Mutations of the IDH1 R132 are reported in 55-80% of grade II/III oligodendroglioma/astrocytomas, over 90% of secondary glioblastomas (GBMs), rarely in primary glioblastoma (Van den Bent et al, 2010), and are associated with favorable prognosis (Uno et al, 2011). In contrast IDH2 mutations are rare, but more common in oligodendroglial tumors, as compared to astrocy¬tomas (Raynaud et al, 2010 protective mechanism in glioma patients which could be the reason for better outcome in patients with mutant IDH than those with the wild-type IDH genes (Zhu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29] Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence For immunohistochemical detection of CXCR7, tissue sections were processed and subjected to antigen retrieval. The slides were immersed in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0, and incubated at 122°C for 4 min using electric pressure cooker (BioCare Medical, Walnut Greek, USA).…”
Section: Quantitative Real Time Pcr (Qrt-pcr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of IDH1 mutation was 80.8% in AGII (21 out of 26), 61.1% in AGIII (11 out of 18) and 12.8% in GBM (11 out of 86) (Figure 1, red lozenges and Table 1), which was also described in our previous study of the frequency of IDH1 mutations in a series of GBM patients [23]. Our GBM cases were composed mainly by primary GBMs, which explains the low frequency of IDH1 mutation.…”
Section: Association Of Lox Bmp1 and Hif1a Mrna Expression Levels Asupporting
confidence: 85%
“…All samples were collected during DNA extraction and IDH1 mutational analyses DNA was extracted from frozen tumor samples using a QiaAmp DNA Micro kit (Qiagen). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by DNA sequencing was applied to detect mutations in IDH1, as previously described [23]. The sequences of primers (5'-3') synthesized by IDT for PCR amplification of exon 4 were as follows:…”
Section: Tissue Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%