2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000300002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Necropsy in Quality Control of Medical Diagnosis – The Gold Standard for Years to Come

Abstract: Despite the well-known valuable role of necropsies in pathology training and their indisputable importance for quality assurance in medical practice, the number of necropsies performed worldwide has decreased over the last few years. This has been ascribed, in part, to the idea that, at the time of death, most diagnoses have already been made using new diagnostic technologies, including clinical, morphological, and molecular pathology and imaging methods. In CLIN-ICS 2008;63(5):581-8, Kotovicz et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For animals younger than one year, three additional categories: neonatal (up to two weeks), juvenile (two weeks to six months) and juvenile-adult (six months to one year) were defined. For the statistical analysis these categories were coded as 0.02, Necropsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis 30 and in this study also, the comparison refers to the pathological diagnosis. Therefore, when analyzing the influence of a diagnosis attribute on the occurrence of diagnosis, the attributes of the pathological diagnosis were used in all cases where both or only the pathological diagnosis were/was available.…”
Section: Comparison Of Diagnosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For animals younger than one year, three additional categories: neonatal (up to two weeks), juvenile (two weeks to six months) and juvenile-adult (six months to one year) were defined. For the statistical analysis these categories were coded as 0.02, Necropsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis 30 and in this study also, the comparison refers to the pathological diagnosis. Therefore, when analyzing the influence of a diagnosis attribute on the occurrence of diagnosis, the attributes of the pathological diagnosis were used in all cases where both or only the pathological diagnosis were/was available.…”
Section: Comparison Of Diagnosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,38,47 Despite advances in modern medicine, autopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis. 30 Inadequate or delayed communication between clinicians and pathologists also sustains declining interest on the part of clinicians. Moreover, fear of a mistake being discovered through an autopsy and possible subsequent malpractice prosecution contribute to clinicians' reluctance, 1,28 even if no increased litigation has been related to high autopsy rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the 30% discrepancy between clinical and pathological diagnoses in Europe and the decreasing number of performed autopsies, [ 8 13 ] cases of clinically unsuspected conditions, which are revealed after postmortem examination, have been published after various studies have been completed. [ 14 16 ] Since hemochromatosis is difficult to diagnose due to the rapid internal organ dysfunction development, autopsy remains one of the main rare condition identifying methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se realiza la apertura de la piel mediante una incisión longitudinal en 'Y' o 'T' que compromete el tórax y el abdomen en toda su longitud (11)(12)(13) , luego de la cual se realiza la evisceración de los órganos mediante los métodos de Rokitansky (disección y evisceración in situ), Virchow (evisceración de cada órgano individualmente), Letulle (en bloque) o Ghon (por sistemas), y al final se efectúa el cierre de la piel (7,14,15) . Existen propuestas para la realización de necropsias mínimamente invasivas o de forma virtual guiada por imáge-nes (16) ; estas conllevan costos muy elevados y no superan la información científica que se obtiene del estudio anátomo patológico de los órganos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified