Twelve tips to write an abstract for a conference: advice for young and experienced investigators

The ‘Abstract’ of a Manuscript: Art of Eloquently Conveying a Riveting Story

“…For example, the EQUATOR (Enhanced QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) guidelines, CONSORT guidelines for abstracts, or those designed for 'overviews of systemic reviews (OoSR) . [9][10][11] Keeping these aside, several general guidelines may help the prospective authors construct an excellent abstract.…”

How to … write an abstract

“…1,2,7,9,10,16 Finally, what is the inevitable next chapter (future research) of this story should be shared. 5,9,13 Edit ruthlessly…”

“…2 Whatever approach you use, aim for structural cohesiveness: alignment between the structures of your abstract and submission (i.e., 'logos'), 2,8 and adhere to the journal or conference guidelines. 2,9,10 If you think of your abstract as a map to guide the reader on their journey through your research, then a mismatched abstract could lead to them becoming lost or the final destination not being reached.…”

“…3 A strong opening statement, headlining the significance and timeliness (i.e., 'hook') of your research problem, in consideration of its relevance to key stakeholders, should grab a reader's interest. 1,2,9,11 Beyond sparking interest, stating the topic and purpose of the research early on establishes a cognitive starting point for the reader to follow throughout the rest of the abstract as the narrative is unpacked. 12 Put differently, if the 'hook' is a seed of promise planted in the introduction, the reader will reap its full rewards, in terms of study implications, in the discussion/conclusion.…”

“…4 This also speaks to delivering on readers expectations (i.e., 'pathos'). 3,9,12 If word count allows, inclusion of literature reviewed, best available evidence or theories/concepts drawn upon supports the 'ethos' or credibility of your research. 7,10,13 In general, references are not included in abstracts, yet referencing a seminal (or recent groundbreaking) paper or naming a key theorist/researcher in the field, can lend rigour (i.e., 'ethos') to your submission.…”