2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37132014000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can ultrasound guidance reduce the risk of pneumothorax following thoracentesis?

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Thoracentesis is one of the bedside procedures most commonly associated with iatrogenic complications, particularly pneumothorax. Various risk factors for complications associated with thoracentesis have recently been identified, including an inexperienced operator; an inadequate or inexperienced support team; the lack of a standardized protocol; and the lack of ultrasound guidance. We sought to determine whether ultrasound-guided thoracentesis can reduce the risk of pneumothorax and improve outcome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
25
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite previous studies reporting the incidence of pneumothorax as high as 19%, recent studies have found pneumothorax to be uncommon following thoracentesis, with reported incidences ranging from 0% to 3% (6,9,19,20). A recent meta-analysis reported a summarized pneumothorax rate of 6.0%, which is comparatively higher than our result (5).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Despite previous studies reporting the incidence of pneumothorax as high as 19%, recent studies have found pneumothorax to be uncommon following thoracentesis, with reported incidences ranging from 0% to 3% (6,9,19,20). A recent meta-analysis reported a summarized pneumothorax rate of 6.0%, which is comparatively higher than our result (5).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Na presente edição do Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, Perazzo et al ( 2 ) apresentam um ensaio controlado randomizado que teve como objetivo avaliar se a toracocentese com o uso do ultrassom, em contraste com um método cego, reduziria a taxa de pneumotórax. Os autores também tiveram como objetivo avaliar se o ultrassom aumenta a eficácia do procedimento (em termos do número de procedimentos de remoção de líquido bem sucedidos e da quantidade de líquido removido).…”
unclassified
“…The negative trial used remote guidance rather than immediate guidance, with ultrasound marking being performed in radiology but aspiration taking place on the ward [123]. A more recent trial also found that ultrasound reduced the risk of pneumothorax from 12% to 1% and increased the likelihood of aspirating fluid [124].…”
Section: Acute Breathlessnessmentioning
confidence: 99%