2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37132010000300007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novos valores de referência para pressões respiratórias máximas na população brasileira

Abstract: Objective: To compare MIP and MEP determined in healthy subjects with those predicted using the equations proposed in another study, and, if necessary, to suggest new equations for MIP and MEP to be used in the Brazilian population. Methods: The study sample comprised 60 healthy males and 60 healthy females, 20-80 years of age (20 subjects per ten-year age bracket). Maximal respiratory pressures were determined following a standardized protocol. Results: Regarding MIP, the measured values were significantly lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
66
4
48

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(31 reference statements)
6
66
4
48
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6] In this study, the variables age and height showed no correlations with the maximum respiratory pressures; thus, they were not included in the linear regression model. This may have been due to the homogeneity of the groups with regard to these variables, unlike in the studies of Black and Hyatt, 10 Neder et al, 11 , Costa et al, 12 and Simões et al, 13 in which these variables showed a negative predictive importance for maximum respiratory pressures. One explanation for this may be the differences in age between the samples, which ranged from 20 to 86 y.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6] In this study, the variables age and height showed no correlations with the maximum respiratory pressures; thus, they were not included in the linear regression model. This may have been due to the homogeneity of the groups with regard to these variables, unlike in the studies of Black and Hyatt, 10 Neder et al, 11 , Costa et al, 12 and Simões et al, 13 in which these variables showed a negative predictive importance for maximum respiratory pressures. One explanation for this may be the differences in age between the samples, which ranged from 20 to 86 y.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Several authors [10][11][12] have determined reference values by means of equations considering sex and age. In a study of healthy sedentary individuals between 20 and 89 y old, Simões et al 13 investigated the relationship of maximum respiratory pressures with age, height, and body mass and proposed predictive equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last years, several studies have comparatively analyzed maximal respiratory pressures and highlighted the discrepancies observed between found and predicted values in different age groups 7,[9][10][11] . Such fact has been attributed to methodological differences, to the quantity and quality of samples evaluated, to equipments and techniques used, besides geographical, social and anthropometric differences of the individuals 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to technique's aspects, it is argued that the use of a nose clip and a flanged mouthpiece contribute to reduce the risks of air escape and consequently avoid the under estimation of the real values measured for maximal respiratory pressures 10 . This aspect may justify the possible underestimation of the obtained values by the study of Wilson et al 6 in which a nose clip has not been used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation