2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37132008000500010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metodologia para caracterização de proficiência em leitura de resultados baciloscópicos para o diagnóstico da tuberculose

Abstract: Double-blind sputum smear microscopy readings using a panel containing 75 slides (36 negative, 4 inconclusive, and 35 positive) proved to be appropriate for characterizing proficiency in sputum smear microscopy for the diagnosis of tuberculosis when such proficiency is intended to reproduce laboratory routine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Vieira et al proposed double-blind sputum smear microscopy readings using a panel of 75 slides (36 negative, 4 inconclusive, 35 positive) to assess proficiency of readers and supervisors in TB smear microscopy ( 59 ). Dave et al assessed technical performance of laboratory supervisors using testing panels comprising 5 heat-fixed unstained sputum slides (including TB positives of any grade and negatives) for staining and examination; only 5% of 295 readers reported any type of error ( 60 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vieira et al proposed double-blind sputum smear microscopy readings using a panel of 75 slides (36 negative, 4 inconclusive, 35 positive) to assess proficiency of readers and supervisors in TB smear microscopy ( 59 ). Dave et al assessed technical performance of laboratory supervisors using testing panels comprising 5 heat-fixed unstained sputum slides (including TB positives of any grade and negatives) for staining and examination; only 5% of 295 readers reported any type of error ( 60 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few reports indicated the competency of staff conducting the rechecking process but relied on concordance of slide reading to determine accuracy; this can be addressed by including reference centre rechecking that assesses both peripheral laboratory technicians and their immediate supervisors; and conducting regular competency assessments of slide readers. Various standards have been proposed to assess competency in TB slide reading but only malaria microscopy has an established globally recognised competency assessment programme ( 52 , 59 , 60 ). Regular competency assessment of supervisors and reference-level staff urgently needs to be incorporated into national EQA programmes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation in false positive result may be due to the difference in study settings, work environment and training level of the laboratory professionals. A false-positive result can cause severe consequences besides incurring financial costs, and a false-negative result causes harm to the patient due to the delay in diagnosis, incurs costs on society, and brings about loss of faith in the services offered by the laboratory [ 3 , 4 , 9 , 13 ]. Therefore, laboratories should undergo extensive review of their procedures and participate in a slide rechecking program in order to produce quality results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, chamou a atenção a seguinte unidade principal, também de ;BRUNO, 2009;MORAES;FILHO;ZAMIAN, 2009;FOGUEL et al, 2009;DI SOUZA;CASTRO, 2009;FRAGA;ZANONI, 2009], 9 fazem parte de textos de Pneumologia RIBEIRO, 2008;VIEIRA et al, 2008;FORTUNATO et al, 2008;SANTOS et al, 2008;HOLANDA et al, 2009;SOUSA et al, 2009;BRANDÃO et al, 2009;MUKAI;ALVES;NASCIMENTO, 2009;FELIX et al, 2009] e 4 integram textos de Educação Especial [PINOTTI;BOSCOLO, 2008;BRACCIALLI et al, 2008;GUARINELLO et al, 2009;MELO;FERREIRA, 2009].…”
Section: Eixos E Unidadesunclassified