Uma nota acerca das relações entre a teoria da relatividade e a filosofia idealista

Gödel, Kurt

doi:10.1590/s1806-11172006000400014

Cited by 42 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Em 1949, Gödel considerou um resultado da SR, a RoS, 1 como implicando certa concepção acerca do tempo (Gödel, 2006). 2 Trata-se de uma posição bastante próxima do que foi advogado por um grande número de autores, dentre eles antigos como Parmênides, modernos como Kant (1992) e contemporâneos como McTaggart (McTaggart,1908).…”

Section: Introdução Ao Argumentounclassified

The Rietdijk-Putnam (Penrose) Argument.

Marques

2018

Principia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, I discuss an argument inspired by the relativity of simultaneity (RoS). That argument purports to establish views such as four-dimensionalism, eternalism and, chiefly, determinism. I will present the most important versions of the argument and point out the differences between them — including Gödel’s version and the idealistic view of time that naturally goes with it. Gödel’s version differs from the others in that he doesn’t endorse determinism. The argument depends crucially on how one interprets Special Relativity (SR). In addition, defenders of the argument make certain semantic and epistemic claims, which lead to an alleged incompatibility between indeterminism and our best theory of time. At the end, I will describe the main reactions to the argument and I will make some general remarks on each of them.

show abstract

Section: Introdução Ao Argumentounclassified

The Rietdijk-Putnam (Penrose) Argument.

Marques

2018

Principia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

What Is Philosophy of Mathematics Looking for?

Palacio¹

2006

18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relativity and the Dimensionality of the World

Petkov¹

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper pursues two aims. First, to show that the only way for presentism or three-dimensionalism to avoid a direct contradiction with relativity is to regard the existence of the physical world as ontologically relativized. This is done by considering the dimensionality of objects involved in relativity of simultaneity, length contraction, and time dilation. Second, to present arguments based on an analysis of the twin paradox which appear to exclude any possibility of a threedimensional world and therefore any need to relativize existence.

show abstract

Uma nota acerca das relações entre a teoria da relatividade e a filosofia idealista

Cited by 42 publications

References 0 publications

The Rietdijk-Putnam (Penrose) Argument.

The Rietdijk-Putnam (Penrose) Argument.

What Is Philosophy of Mathematics Looking for?

Relativity and the Dimensionality of the World

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About