2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1679-78252014001000007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the size dependent pull-in instability of beam-type NEMS using strain gradient theory

Abstract: It is well recognized that size dependency of materials characteristics, i.e. size-effect, often plays a significant role in the performance of nano-structures. Herein, strain gradient continuum theory is employed to investigate the size dependent pull-in instability of beam-type nano-electromechanical systems (NEMS). Two most common types of NEMS i.e. nano-bridge and nano-cantilever are considered. Effects of electrostatic field and dispersion forces i.e. Casimir and van der Waals (vdW) attractions have been … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figure indicate that the frequency evaluated by the strain gradient theory is greater than that evaluated by the classical and couple stress theory, noted that the couple stress theory predicts higher values for the frequency than dose the classical theory. Hence, it is inferred that the microbeams modeled by the non-classical theories are in fact stiffer than those modeled by the classical theory as it is reported by other researchers (Kong et al, 2009, Koochi et al, 2014, Vatankhah et al, 2013b. Moreover, it is deduced that the strain gradient theory predicts the micro-beams stiffer than does the couple stress theory.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The figure indicate that the frequency evaluated by the strain gradient theory is greater than that evaluated by the classical and couple stress theory, noted that the couple stress theory predicts higher values for the frequency than dose the classical theory. Hence, it is inferred that the microbeams modeled by the non-classical theories are in fact stiffer than those modeled by the classical theory as it is reported by other researchers (Kong et al, 2009, Koochi et al, 2014, Vatankhah et al, 2013b. Moreover, it is deduced that the strain gradient theory predicts the micro-beams stiffer than does the couple stress theory.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In studies associated with the strain gradient theory, for numerical evaluations, the researchers usually consider these three length scale parameters to be the same and indeed equal to the length scale parameter used in the modified couple stress theory (Kong et al, 2009, Koochi et al, 2014. In order to determine the length scale parameter for a specific material, some typical experiments such as micro-bend test, micro-torsion test and specially micro/nano indentation test can be carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pull-in instability of cantilever and fixed-fixed beam-type nano structure and nano switches using strain gradient and couple stress theory have been studied in refs. [5,6,28,29]. Keivani et al [7] investigated the instability analysis of nanotweezers using couple stress theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This non-classic continuum theory introduces three material length-scale parameters to characterize the dilatation gradient tensor, the deviatoric stretch gradient tensor, and the symmetric rotation gradient tensor. The strain gradient theory has been applied to analyze mechanical behavior of ultra-small beams and other structures by many authors [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%