2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1679-78252014000600003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening of structurally damaged wide shallow RC beams using externally bonded CFRP plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main debonding failure modes: intermediate crack (IC)-induced debonding and plate end (PE) debonding. IC debonding occurs in FRP-strengthened RC beams in the region of high moment due to the opening of flexural cracks [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. On the other hand, PE debonding initiates at the plate end region due to high interfacial and normal stresses [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main debonding failure modes: intermediate crack (IC)-induced debonding and plate end (PE) debonding. IC debonding occurs in FRP-strengthened RC beams in the region of high moment due to the opening of flexural cracks [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. On the other hand, PE debonding initiates at the plate end region due to high interfacial and normal stresses [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultimate capacity of slabs SL1-35% and SL1-50% increased by 98% and 123% compared to the control slab, respectively. The ultimate loads of slabs SL1-35% and SL1-50% are 75 and 85 kN, respectively (Al-Zaid et al, 2014). As preloading level increases, the crack width will increase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A database of 65 FRP-strengthened RC beams that failed by ICD [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ] has been analysed, in addition to the 3 specimens described in the previous section, thus giving a total of 68 specimens. The geometrical and material properties of the beams are listed in Table 6 , as well as the debonding failure load ( P u,exp ) and bending moment ( M u,exp ).…”
Section: Models Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%