2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1679-62252011000300004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species of sand-dwelling catfish, with a phylogenetic diagnosis of Pygidianops Myers (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae: Glanapteryginae)

Abstract: A new species of sand-dwelling catfish genus Pygidianops, P. amphioxus, is described from the Negro and lower Amazon basins. The new species differs from its three congeners in the elongate eel-like body, the short barbels, and the small caudal fin, continuous with the body, among other traits of internal anatomy. The absence of anal fin further distinguishes P. amphioxus from all other Pygidianops species except P. magoi and the presence of eyes from all except P. cuao. The new Pygidianops seems to be the sis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the only apomorphic condition shared by Listrura and glanapterygines is the common absence of pelvic fin, although most specimens of G. anguilla and the only known specimen of Glanapteryx niobium de Pinna, have a rudimentary pelvic fin (de Pinna, , ). Abundant morphological evidence has been described corroborating Glanapteryginae monophyly excluding Listrura and sister group relationships between Pygidianops and Typhlobelus (Baskin, ; Costa & Bockmann, ; de Pinna & Kirovsky, ; de Pinna & Zuanon, ), as well as the present study clearly indicates that species of Listrura forms a clade distantly related to Pygidianops amphioxus (Figure ), the only glanapterygine available for the present study, thus supporting exclusion of Listrura from the Glanapteryginae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the only apomorphic condition shared by Listrura and glanapterygines is the common absence of pelvic fin, although most specimens of G. anguilla and the only known specimen of Glanapteryx niobium de Pinna, have a rudimentary pelvic fin (de Pinna, , ). Abundant morphological evidence has been described corroborating Glanapteryginae monophyly excluding Listrura and sister group relationships between Pygidianops and Typhlobelus (Baskin, ; Costa & Bockmann, ; de Pinna & Kirovsky, ; de Pinna & Zuanon, ), as well as the present study clearly indicates that species of Listrura forms a clade distantly related to Pygidianops amphioxus (Figure ), the only glanapterygine available for the present study, thus supporting exclusion of Listrura from the Glanapteryginae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although a detailed study to test monophyly of the Amazon Sarcoglanidinae is beyond the scope of the present paper, the absence or extreme reduction in opercular teeth described among other features by Baskin () to diagnose a clade containing the Amazon sarcoglanidine genera Malacoglanis and Sarcoglanis and the glanapterygine genera Glanapteryx , Pygidianops and Typhlobelus , may corroborate the Amazon Sarcoglanidinae paraphyly hypothesis indicated in our analysis. Past and recent studies have confirmed that in species of the genera Sarcoglanis , Glanapteryx , Pygidianops and Typhlobelus , opercular odontodes are absent, whereas in Malacoglanis they are rudimentary (Baskin, ; Claeson et al, ; Costa & Bockmann, ; Myers, ; Myers & Weitzman, ; de Pinna, , ; de Pinna & Kirovsky, ; de Pinna & Zuanon, ; Schaefer et al, ), thus contrasting with the robust opercular odontodes in Stauroglanis and Stenolicmus (de Pinna, ; de Pinna & Starnes, ; Figure d). The presence of a long posterior narrow process on the opercular bone, also described to Baskin for that group, is present at least in species of Malacoglanis , Glanapteryx , Pygidianops and Typhlobelus (Baskin, ; de Pinna, ; de Pinna & Kirovsky, ; de Pinna & Zuanon, ), but not in Stauroglanis , Stenolicmus and Ammoglanis (Costa, ; Mattos et al, ; de Pinna, ; de Pinna & Starnes, ; de Pinna & Winemiller, ; Figure d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, L. camposi displays a putative plesiomorphic condition in comparison to remaining glanapterygines. A fusion between all elements of the caudal skeleton has being considered as a synapomorphic character for Glanapteryginae (e.g., de Pinna, 1988de Pinna, , 1989de Pinna, , 1998. In L.camposi, hypurals 3-5 are separated from hypurals 1-2 (Fig.…”
Section: About Taxonomic Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%