“…Although a detailed study to test monophyly of the Amazon Sarcoglanidinae is beyond the scope of the present paper, the absence or extreme reduction in opercular teeth described among other features by Baskin () to diagnose a clade containing the Amazon sarcoglanidine genera Malacoglanis and Sarcoglanis and the glanapterygine genera Glanapteryx , Pygidianops and Typhlobelus , may corroborate the Amazon Sarcoglanidinae paraphyly hypothesis indicated in our analysis. Past and recent studies have confirmed that in species of the genera Sarcoglanis , Glanapteryx , Pygidianops and Typhlobelus , opercular odontodes are absent, whereas in Malacoglanis they are rudimentary (Baskin, ; Claeson et al, ; Costa & Bockmann, ; Myers, ; Myers & Weitzman, ; de Pinna, , ; de Pinna & Kirovsky, ; de Pinna & Zuanon, ; Schaefer et al, ), thus contrasting with the robust opercular odontodes in Stauroglanis and Stenolicmus (de Pinna, ; de Pinna & Starnes, ; Figure d). The presence of a long posterior narrow process on the opercular bone, also described to Baskin for that group, is present at least in species of Malacoglanis , Glanapteryx , Pygidianops and Typhlobelus (Baskin, ; de Pinna, ; de Pinna & Kirovsky, ; de Pinna & Zuanon, ), but not in Stauroglanis , Stenolicmus and Ammoglanis (Costa, ; Mattos et al, ; de Pinna, ; de Pinna & Starnes, ; de Pinna & Winemiller, ; Figure d).…”