2021
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-9946202163029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of trachoma in Pernambuco State, Brazil (2014-2015)

Abstract: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This report is high than compared to previous finding 6% in Dangilla, 7 11.8% in Metema, 26 and 6.65% in Brazil. 27 The major reason for the discrepancy may be our study report was compiled post-war among displaced and resettled populations, which may increase the estimation in addition to differences in the sample size and environmental characteristics of the comparison groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This report is high than compared to previous finding 6% in Dangilla, 7 11.8% in Metema, 26 and 6.65% in Brazil. 27 The major reason for the discrepancy may be our study report was compiled post-war among displaced and resettled populations, which may increase the estimation in addition to differences in the sample size and environmental characteristics of the comparison groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…There are not many surveys done in large metropolitan areas of Brazil: two were performed in the Sao Paulo metropolitan area, both in the early 2000s, showing prevalence higher than ours and one study conducted in Recife city, Northeastern Brazil, in 2014-15 [20][21][22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Despite this limitation, we postulate the results are still important once few trachoma prevalence studies have been conducted in outskirt, impoverished communities of Brazil's large metropolitan areas. All but one of them were done in the previous decades [20][21][22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%