2018
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-9946201860043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dengue in Brazil in 2017: what happened?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
17
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that these susceptibility cycles were critical to the performance of models, particularly those which identified weather patterns suitable for a dengue outbreak in a year with potentially low population susceptibility to infection. For instance, this approach correctly identified 3 additional non-epidemics in 2017 compared to weather patterns alone, supporting the discourse on the unusually low dengue activity seen in Brazil in 2017 34 . Still, our models missed half (6/12) of non-epidemics in 2014, which was predicted by experts to be a low transmission year due to immunity provided by a large 2013 outbreak with no changes in circulating DENV serotypes 35,36 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…We found that these susceptibility cycles were critical to the performance of models, particularly those which identified weather patterns suitable for a dengue outbreak in a year with potentially low population susceptibility to infection. For instance, this approach correctly identified 3 additional non-epidemics in 2017 compared to weather patterns alone, supporting the discourse on the unusually low dengue activity seen in Brazil in 2017 34 . Still, our models missed half (6/12) of non-epidemics in 2014, which was predicted by experts to be a low transmission year due to immunity provided by a large 2013 outbreak with no changes in circulating DENV serotypes 35,36 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Although preventive measures sponsored by the public health authorities have been suggested as the cause of the decline in dengue incidence (Santiago, 2016), it is not clear why such supposedly measures did not protect against the huge Zika virus outbreak that occurred during the same year and whose etiologic agent is transmitted by the same vector, likewise why the peak in the Zika virus epidemic took place in 2016 despite the highly positive coefficient value in wavelet transformation. In any case, the causes of this dengue decline are still not fully understood (Lopes et al, 2018). The temporal coincidence between the two viruses might have cause some sort of competition that would have caused only one of the two to peak at a time.…”
Section: Temporal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, we do not know if had the Zika virus arrived earlier its peak might had been even stronger due to even more favorable El Niño conditions and it might have coincided temporally with that of dengue or conversely, if one of the two would have just inhibited the other. In any case, the causes of this dengue decline are still not fully understood (Lopes et al, 2018).…”
Section: Temporal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…losses, and led the authorities to formulate strategies to attempt to increase vector control [1]. In 2015 and 2016, an annual average of 1,586,155 probable cases of dengue were recorded in Brazil; although a reduction to 252,054 cases was observed in 2017 [2], which could be the result of the cross-herd immunity to Zika virus [3]. The differential diagnosis of these diseases is difficult because of the similarity of symptoms, cross-reactivity, co-circulation and overlap of infections by different arbovirus species and strains [4,5] Arboviral transmission has multiple causes and contributory contextual factors, impacted by the influence of social, environmental and cultural determinants in the course of the natural history of disease [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiological studies have clearly associated the expansion of these diseases with haphazard and unplanned urban development processes, mainly caused by the lack of infrastructure and basic sanitation in areas that have been occupied without prior planning. In northeast Brazil, the population has been disproportionately affected by arboviruses, with 94% of all cases of congenital Zika syndrome being reported in this region [2,6,7]. Poor access to garbage collection and an intermittent water supply provide conditions for vector breeding, which in turn makes vector control more difficult in this region [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%