2016
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-9946201658010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver Biopsy: Importance of Specimen Size in the Diagnosis and Staging of Chronic Viral Hepatitis

Abstract: Liver biopsy is the gold standard method for the grading and staging of chronic viral hepatitis, but optimal biopsy specimen size remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of liver specimen (number of portal tracts) and to evaluate the impact of the number of portal tracts in the staging of chronic hepatitis.Material and Methods: 468 liver biopsies from consecutive patients with hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus infection from 2009 to 2010 were evaluated. Results: The lengt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this problem, primary antibodies selection was performed according to their high affinity for the antigen and in addition, secondary antibodies as well as suitable amplification systems were used in order to enhance the signal thus providing for higher sensitivity. On the other hand, despite the advantage of hepatic microenvironment studies, liver biopsy has been associated with sampling error, mostly due to suboptimal biopsy size that may not be an accurate representation of the whole organ; to minimize this only those specimens with 10 or more portal tracts were included . Lastly, it is reasonable to underline that our study only provides a snapshot of a specific time in HBV infection, and the hepatic microenvironment may fluctuate during the natural course of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem, primary antibodies selection was performed according to their high affinity for the antigen and in addition, secondary antibodies as well as suitable amplification systems were used in order to enhance the signal thus providing for higher sensitivity. On the other hand, despite the advantage of hepatic microenvironment studies, liver biopsy has been associated with sampling error, mostly due to suboptimal biopsy size that may not be an accurate representation of the whole organ; to minimize this only those specimens with 10 or more portal tracts were included . Lastly, it is reasonable to underline that our study only provides a snapshot of a specific time in HBV infection, and the hepatic microenvironment may fluctuate during the natural course of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These favorable results with qFibrosis are in contrast to those from studies with traditional methods demonstrating substantial sampling error [4, 6, 7, 17, 18]. For these methods, a relatively generous 2-cm-long sample is now recommended [8, 19], leading to increased peri-operative risk [10, 20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diğer yandan, bu testleri fibroz durumunu iyi öngörebilen testler olarak öneren çalışmalar da mevcuttur ve bu test sonuçlarıyla birlikte çeşitli algoritmalar kullanarak hastalara biyopsi uygulanması ihtiyacının azaldığı vurgulanmaktadır (22). APRI, FIB4, FibroTest ® (Bi-oPredictive, Paris, Fransa) ve FibroScan ® gibi testleri, DSÖ de biyopsi ihtiyacını azaltmak ve tedavi ihtiyacı olan hastayı belirlemek için önermektedir (10,17). Bu testlerle yanlış pozitif ve negatif değerlendirmeler olabildiğinden bu testlerin yanında yaş, yüksek ALT ve HBV DNA seviyesi gibi diğer kriterlerin de kullanılması önerilmektedir (3,5).…”
Section: İrdelemeunclassified