2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-91992012000400013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial properties of contact defensive secretions in neotropical Crematogaster ants

Abstract: Abstract:Crematogaster ants use their contact venoms to compete with other ants. Although those venoms are used primarily as repellent and toxic secretions, they may have other functions. The present study aimed to test the antibacterial property of abdominal venom of three neotropical Crematogaster ant species (C. distans, C. pygmaea and C. rochai) against gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and gram-positive (Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria. Sterile filter pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ants in the subfamily Formicinae, which includes Camponotus , produce formic acid as a defence compound against vertebrates and other insects, but formic acid is also used to inhibit fungal pathogens [ 34 , 35 ]. Similarly, the venoms of Crematogaster [ 36 ] and Solenopsis [ 8 ] are both known to inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus bacteria. Ants in the subfamily Dolichoderinae lack a stinging apparatus, but they produce defensive compounds in the pygidial gland that could also have antimicrobial properties [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ants in the subfamily Formicinae, which includes Camponotus , produce formic acid as a defence compound against vertebrates and other insects, but formic acid is also used to inhibit fungal pathogens [ 34 , 35 ]. Similarly, the venoms of Crematogaster [ 36 ] and Solenopsis [ 8 ] are both known to inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus bacteria. Ants in the subfamily Dolichoderinae lack a stinging apparatus, but they produce defensive compounds in the pygidial gland that could also have antimicrobial properties [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most substances are acids (Ortius-Lechner et al, 2000;Yek & Mueller, 2011;Yek et al, 2012;Fernández-Marin et al, 2015) and protein substances (Yek et al, 2012), with antimicrobial function (Yek et al, 2012;Mendonça et al, 2009;Pech & Billen, 2017). The mandibular glands, venom gland and Dufour gland also present a broad spectrum of chemical compounds with proven toxic, repellent and antimicrobial effects (Mendonça et al, 2009;Quinet et al, 2012;Tragust, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical characterization of the substances present in the secretions was the second goal that most motivated the investigation of glandular secretions of ants (Castricani et al, 2003;Wood et al, 2011;Martins et al, 2015). Antimicrobial activity of glandular secretions of ants appears as the third most cited objective in the literature consulted (Attygale et al, 1989;Quinet et al, 2012;Song et al, 2012). Evidence in the studies consulted suggests that investment in antimicrobial substances has evolved repeatedly in social strains and may be particularly important for species living in large, complex societies such as ants of the tribe Attini (Atta and Acromyrmex), made up of large numbers of individuals living in obligatory mutualism with a homogeneous culture of fungi (Penick et al, 2018).…”
Section: Extractionmethods Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Venoms produced by ants of the subfamilies Paraponerinae, Ectatomminae, Pseudomyrmecinae, Myrmeciinae, Myrmicinae and Ponerinae are rich in peptides with myotoxic, neurotoxic, cytotoxic or antimicrobial properties (Akre and Reed 2002;Palma 2006;Moreau 2013). Pachycondyla goeldii, Myrmecia pilosula, Crematogaster pygmaea and Dinoponera australis ant venoms have antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains (Orivel et al 2001;Zelezetsky et al 2005;Johnson et al 2010;Quinet et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%