2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-86212010000400007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparação cruzada entre pesquisas laboratoriais e de campo em conforto térmico em espaços abertos urbanos

Abstract: Resumoste artigo apresenta uma comparação cruzada entre pesquisas laboratoriais e de campo em conforto térmico em espaços abertos urbanos. O objetivo da pesquisa é verificar comparativamente os resultados de bases empíricas laboratoriais e de campo, estabelecidas na cidade de São Paulo. Para tanto, consideram-se modelos preditivos desenvolvidos, adaptados ou utilizados em pesquisas de conforto térmico em espaços abertos. Ao mesmo tempo, verificam-se comparativamente os referidos modelos, com indicação de uso d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also the possibility of applying prediction models to help and improve this type of analysis, making it more robust and concrete, in addition to assisting in mapping changes in each city and can perform a data crossing comparing meteorological variables, i.e., comfort indices with deforestation and fires in the Amazon. Monteiro and Alucci (2010) verified the differences in laboratory analysis and field surveys by comparing the results based on predictive models, thus obtaining good correlation rates, i.e., calibration factors for the indices.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…There is also the possibility of applying prediction models to help and improve this type of analysis, making it more robust and concrete, in addition to assisting in mapping changes in each city and can perform a data crossing comparing meteorological variables, i.e., comfort indices with deforestation and fires in the Amazon. Monteiro and Alucci (2010) verified the differences in laboratory analysis and field surveys by comparing the results based on predictive models, thus obtaining good correlation rates, i.e., calibration factors for the indices.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 66%