Treatment effects of R-appliance and Anterior Inclined Bite Plate in Class II, Division I malocclusion

Showkatbakhsh, Rahman; Meybodi, Shahin Emami; Jamilian, Abdolreza; Meybodi, Seyyed Amir Reza Fatahi; Meybodi, Elham Morshedi

doi:10.1590/s1678-77572011000600015

Cited by 16 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Epidemiological surveys assist in recognizing the oral health conditions of different populations, which is essential for taking preventive/interceptive measurements (Perillo et al, 2011a;2011b;Showkatbakhsh et al, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between Malocclusion and Oral Habits

Giugliano¹,

Apuzzo²,

Jamilian³

et al. 2014

Current Research in Dentistry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In addition to heredity, oral habits are considered important factors in the etiology of malocclusion. This study was taken to assess the relationship between Malocclusion and Oral Habits. The sample comprised of 674 orthodontically untreated subjects, 324 males (48%) and 350 females (52%) 12 to 15-year-old schoolchildren from the southern part of Italy. Orthodontic variables and oral habits including mouth breathing and swallowing pattern; thumb, finger and lip sucking; and nail biting of the patients were evaluate. Two examiners, who had been previously trained in the use of occlusal indices, screened all the schoolchildren. The chi-square and binomial test was used to evaluate the data. A total of 589 of the subjects were found to have deleterious oral habits. Nail biting was found to be the most common habit (65.5%) followed by lip sucking (42.7%), mouth breathing (28.6%), abnormal swallowing pattern (22.7%) and thumb sucking (13.2%). Positive association exist between deleterious oral habits and malocclusions; however, there is no significant relationship between the type of oral habit and malocclusions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between Malocclusion and Oral Habits

Giugliano¹,

Apuzzo²,

Jamilian³

et al. 2014

Current Research in Dentistry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One of the most critical limitation of this study might be that the upper airway dimension was evaluated based on a 2-dimensional cephalometric measurement [22][23][24]. Therefore it is still unknown whether changes in respiratory function could be induced following the increased maxillary growth during maxillary protraction appliance treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Maxillary Protrusion on Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions

Jamilian¹,

Showkatbakhsh²,

Borna³

et al. 2014

J Dent Probl Solut

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The relationship between position of the maxillary structures caused by maxillary protraction therapy and airway dimensions has not been investigated as comprehensively as the skeletal changes. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of treatment with a maxillary protraction appliance on upper airway dimensions. Material and Methods:Twenty Five patients including 13 females, 12 males with the mean age of 10.66 years (range, +0.7, -0.8 years) with skeletal Cl III malocclusion due to maxillary deficiency were selected in this study. All of the patients were treated by using a maxillary protraction (Tongue Appliance) as the only treatment appliance. Lateral cephalograms were taken before and after treatment. Data were analyzed statistically by means of paired T-test. Results:No significant increase in the width of upper and middle horizontal airway dimension was seen. Significant increases were observed in the length of vertical airway dimension (P<0.001). Conclusion:These results demonstrated that Tongue Appliance doesn't affect sagittal airway dimensions but it increases vertical dimensions in the short time.Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of an intra-oral maxillary protraction appliance named tongue appliance on the dimensions of the upper airway in patients with Cl III malocclusion and maxillary deficiency. Materials and MethodsThe study was done according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.In this study 25 patients (13 females, 12 males) with mean age of 10.6 (SD 0.7) years who were treated with tongue appliance were selected. All samples had following inclusion criteria.Presence of a skeletal Cl III malocclusion due to maxillary deficiency with SNA≤78. SNB ≤80. ANB ≤0 Edge to edge incisor relationship or anterior crossbite, flat or concave facial profile.The patients were treated with tongue appliance alone.4-No other congenital anomalies, endocrine, nasopharyngeal disorders, tonsillitis, adenitis, previous orthopedic, orthodontic treatment, and rhinoplasty were present.Tongue appliance [10] used for the treatment of the samples was constructed by Adams clasps for first upper molars and c clasps in the anterior teeth in order to increase the retention. Three to five separate spurs incorporated in the palatal between canine to canine areas. These spurs were as long as to cage the tongue and they were adjusted in clinic to avoid traumatizing the floor of the mouth. This appliance was used for approximately 22 hours a day. The average treatment IntroductionThe skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of orthopedic appliances in patients with Class III (Cl III) malocclusions and maxillary deficiency have been well documented in literature. Numerous appliance designs such as endosseous implants [1], ankylozed teeth [2], surgically assisted orthopedic protraction [3], distraction osteogenesis [4,5], Hybrid Hyrax appliance [6], reverse chin cup [7,8], face mask [9], tongue appliance [10][11][12], and tongue plate [13] have been used for treatment ...

show abstract

“…2a, 2b, and 3). Retro-incisive bite planes have already been used by various authors, either for problems such as bruxism1 or in the form of a retro-incisal plane on removable devices to correct early class II 7,17,18 , and more rarely, with a multi-attachment device and, in this case, with the aim of avoiding interferences between the upper incisors and the bonded attachments of the lower incisors to reduce the risk of detaching the attachments.…”

Section: Fixed Anterior Bite Platementioning

confidence: 99%

Functionally orientated/systemic approach to orthodontic treatment of severe class II division 1 malocclusions: an adapted device, the FABP

Raymond¹

2018

J Dentofacial Anom Orthod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The orthodontic treatment of severe class II division 1 malocclusions is often difficult, which leads some specialists to offer a surgical correction of the overjet. Treatment is made complex by the value of the horizontal overlap as much as the « depth » of deep bite that is very often present alongside the malocclusion. This is why we are offering a treatment protocol including a FABP (Fixed Anterior Bite Plate) which will allow, if the patient cooperates, to correct the anatomic anomaly while concurrently establishing new masticatory cycles in order to stabilize and preserve the results obtained. It is this systemic approach of treatment that is the focus of this article.

show abstract

Treatment effects of R-appliance and Anterior Inclined Bite Plate in Class II, Division I malocclusion

Cited by 16 publications

References 23 publications

Relationship between Malocclusion and Oral Habits

Relationship between Malocclusion and Oral Habits

The Effects of Maxillary Protrusion on Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions

Functionally orientated/systemic approach to orthodontic treatment of severe class II division 1 malocclusions: an adapted device, the FABP

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About