Evaluation of the reproducibility of two techniques used to determine and record centric relation in angle's class I patients

Paixão, Fernanda; Silva, Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e; Silva, Frederico Andrade e; Ramos, Guilherme da Gama; Cruz, Mônica Vieira de Jesus

doi:10.1590/s1678-77572007000400007

Cited by 25 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 15 publications

(21 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Swenson et al [ 3 ] recorded CR using five different techniques such as tongue tip to soft palate, chin point guidance, leaf gauge, bimanual manipulation, and Roth Power Bite, at five different time points and concluded that all the five techniques were highly repeatable with very small range of variations. Paixão et al [ 24 ] investigated the reproducibility of Dawson's bilateral manipulation and Gysi's Gothic arch tracing CR registration techniques in healthy individuals who presented Angle's Class I occlusion. They found that the Gysi's Gothic arch tracing was more accurate compared to the bilateral manipulation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A clinical comparative study to assess the efficacy of a new centric registration technique with a conventional technique

Sushma

Roy

Sanyal

et al. 2019

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The aim and objectives of this study were to assess and compare the efficacy of a new copyrighted technique (wax ball technique, L-77997/2018) and design (denture base design for the wax ball technique, L-78006/2018) for recording centric relation (CR). Settings and Designs: In vivo – comparative study. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on sixty consented edentulous patients. The study participants were divided into Group I and Group II. CR in Group I patients was recorded using Dawson's bimanual technique (technique 1). For participants in Group II, CR was recorded using the authors’ copyrighted technique (technique 2). Time taken and accuracy of CR records by both the techniques were evaluated. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics such as frequency and percentage were calculated for categorical variables, mean and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables. Independent t -test was used to compare the time taken to record the CR between the two groups. The accuracy of both the techniques was assessed by Mann–Whitney U-test. Results: The mean time taken for technique 1 was 56.47 s, whereas for technique 2, it was 5.97 s, with an overall mean difference of 50.5 s between the two techniques. Both techniques were found to be accurate, as the CR recorded during jaw relation matched with CR during trial in all the cases in both the groups (frequency 30 (N) and cumulative percentage 100%). Conclusion: From the study, it was found that, time taken for technique 2 was statistically less compared to that of technique 1, and both the techniques were found to be equally accurate.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A clinical comparative study to assess the efficacy of a new centric registration technique with a conventional technique

Sushma

Roy

Sanyal

et al. 2019

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This strong consistency might be the result of a better subject "deprogramming" procedure prior to the CR record registration. Numerous scientific publications (21,26,32,(33)(34)(35)(36) have pointed out that bimanual mandibular manipulation with anterior deprogrammer is one of the most reliable and reproducible methods of determining CR in dentistry. However, there are also scientific publications that oppose this finding, as the one conducted by Paixão et al (37).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reproducibility of Centric Relation Techniques by means of Condyle Position Analysis

Galeković¹,

Fugošić

Braut

et al. 2017

Acta Stomatol Croat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The accuracy and reproducibility of CR and recording materials have been studied in the dental literature with varying results 18–41 . Grasso and Sharry 18 evaluated the reproducibility of the Gothic arch tracings on dentate subjects over a 29‐day period.…”

Section: Focus Question 1: What Are the Techniques Used And Their Repmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Materials and Reproducible Techniques May Be Used in Recording Centric Relation? Best Evidence Consensus Statement

Kattadiyil

Alzaid

Campbell

2021

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this Best Evidence Consensus Statement was to evaluate the existing literature relative to two focus questions: What are the techniques used and their reproducibility in recording centric relation (CR) in a dentate and partially dentate population and what effect do different recording materials have on the reproducibility of CR? Materials and Methods Keywords used in the initial search were: CR, interocclusal records, CR accuracy, CR reproducibility, and CR technique. The search was then limited to Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Studies, Meta‐analyses, and Clinical Trials. Results Initial search related to the selected search terms resulted in more than 3500 articles. When subsequent search was limited to Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Studies, and Meta‐Analysis and Clinical Trials, this resulted in 291 articles selected for further analysis. Conclusions Techniques using chin point guidance, bimanual manipulation, power centric, Gothic arch tracing, leaf gauge, and anterior deprogramming devices to record CR can all be comparable in precision and clinical accuracy in regards to clinical relevance. Practitioner experience and familiarity with a particular technique is critical for accuracy when recording CR. Polyvinyl siloxane and polyether consistently performed better in the broad range of studies on recording materials. Virtual capture of CR could serve as a comparable recording medium but requires further clinical study.

show abstract

Evaluation of the reproducibility of two techniques used to determine and record centric relation in angle's class I patients

Cited by 25 publications

References 15 publications

A clinical comparative study to assess the efficacy of a new centric registration technique with a conventional technique

A clinical comparative study to assess the efficacy of a new centric registration technique with a conventional technique

Reproducibility of Centric Relation Techniques by means of Condyle Position Analysis

What Materials and Reproducible Techniques May Be Used in Recording Centric Relation? Best Evidence Consensus Statement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About