2004
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572004000500003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water movement across bonded dentin - too much of a good thing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
30
0
18

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
30
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…12 The study by Pushpa and Suresh 18 confirmed that the marginal microleakage of composite restorations bonded with one-step self-etch adhesives is closely related to the hydrophilicity of adhesive layer, which is able to generate structure defects in the bonding interface. 19 In this case, the leakage observed may be created mainly by the structure defects within the bonding interface and therefore shows no correlation to the polymerization contraction of the restorations. 20 Accordingly, it is likely that the leakage in the present study demonstrates more action of the structure defects and less action of polymerization contraction of the restoration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…12 The study by Pushpa and Suresh 18 confirmed that the marginal microleakage of composite restorations bonded with one-step self-etch adhesives is closely related to the hydrophilicity of adhesive layer, which is able to generate structure defects in the bonding interface. 19 In this case, the leakage observed may be created mainly by the structure defects within the bonding interface and therefore shows no correlation to the polymerization contraction of the restorations. 20 Accordingly, it is likely that the leakage in the present study demonstrates more action of the structure defects and less action of polymerization contraction of the restoration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As the amount of free radicals available decreases, a hybrid layer with a low degree of conversion is generated, which impairs adhesion. The fact that, in this study, the dentin was hybridized with a hydrophobic conventional 3-step adhesive system, which provides an impermeable barrier (TAY et al, 2004), might explain why the Provy sample did not differ from the Control sample. That is, this procedure might have prevented contact between the water in the dentinal tubules and the eugenol-containing temporary cement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Dyad, Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Several classifications have been proposed for adhesive systems 9,45 . One of the more commonly used is the classification by generation 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several classifications have been proposed for adhesive systems 9,45 . One of the more commonly used is the classification by generation 9 . This standard does not appear to be the most viable as it implies the notion that the state-of-the-art adhesives have superior performance over adhesives of prior generations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%