2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-58782009000100005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metrics for nonlinear model updating in structural dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vismara et al [100] updated the finite element model of the flap of the intermediate experimental space vehicle using the RFS model. da Silva et al [94] compared the performance of two metrics based on the HB, one using the CRE, two using the RFS and one computing the POD for nonlinear model updating. According to their conclusion, in the case of strong non-linearity only the RFS method is able to update correctly the model.…”
Section: Restoring Force Surface (Rfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vismara et al [100] updated the finite element model of the flap of the intermediate experimental space vehicle using the RFS model. da Silva et al [94] compared the performance of two metrics based on the HB, one using the CRE, two using the RFS and one computing the POD for nonlinear model updating. According to their conclusion, in the case of strong non-linearity only the RFS method is able to update correctly the model.…”
Section: Restoring Force Surface (Rfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three different approaches suitable for single degree of freedom nonlinear systems are illustrated in this section: the harmonic balance (HB), Volterra series in the frequency domain and the restoring force surface (RFS). A more in depth description of other error metrics can be found in the paper [94].…”
Section: Example Of Error Estimation: Symmetric Duffing Oscillatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these methods appear to be adequate for locating and quantifying damage when significant damage is induced in the structure, they are not sufficient for updating the parameters that govern nonlinear behavior of RC structures. [10][11][12][13] Therefore, these methods are not appropriate for determining future performance of the structure. In this regard, Zhang and Guo combined the proper orthogonal decomposition with a design of experiments to update nonlinear material parameters based on strain measurements with uncertainty consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the decomposition is essentially a linear tool, and there are some difficulties that must be overcome in the future. 10 On the other hand, Song et al 11 proposed a nonlinear model updating method for a RC shear wall. A nonlinear hysteretic material model 15 was first applied to construct a nonlinear FE model of the RC shear wall so that the fundamental hysteretic behavior of the RC shear wall could be portrayed accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution to overcome this drawback is to use a clustering technique, for example fuzzy c-means clustering or Loyd algorithm, to separate the data into groups and then to apply the POD to each cluster so as to preserve the character of the nonlinear effects [6]. Silva et al [7] proposed a comparative study between these different classical metrics for nonlinear model updating based on vibration test data. Four approaches in the frequency and time domain were implemented: harmonic balance method, constitutive relation error, restoring force surface and Karhunen-Loè ve decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%