2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382011000300017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications and conversions of upper tract urological laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (less): multicentre experience: results from the NOTES Working Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in the initial stages there may be a higher rate of postoperative complications until such time that the learning curve has reached a plateau. 63 Technical challenges include access, 64 poor triangulation and lack of space leading to instrument clash, 65 which may be overcome by the use of 30° cameras. 22 Instrument control may also be less intuitive.…”
Section: Appraisal Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the initial stages there may be a higher rate of postoperative complications until such time that the learning curve has reached a plateau. 63 Technical challenges include access, 64 poor triangulation and lack of space leading to instrument clash, 65 which may be overcome by the use of 30° cameras. 22 Instrument control may also be less intuitive.…”
Section: Appraisal Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the series of exclusively robotic LESS‐PN, conversion to open surgery via ‘mini‐incision open access’ was reported in two cases (14.3%); however this group did not convert any cases to multiport laparoscopy . This may reflect a difference in baseline comfort with advanced laparoscopy, as all of these robot‐assisted LESS cases were converted directly to an open approach rather than the lower rate of conversion stated in other series of between 0 and 1.5% .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The indication for conversion was a failure to progress effectively via a single-site approach due to intra-abdominal adhesions from prior surgeries necessitating extensive adhesiolysis. Conversion from LESS-PN cohorts to conventional laparoscopy was reported in 6.8-12.5% in large series of urological LESS that focused on assessing complications and conversions [19,20]. This number varies widely due to differing definitions of 'conversion' based on use of accessory ports in LESS cases.…”
Section: Finding Mean (Sd; Range) Duration Follow-up Monthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In un recente studio multicentrico (14), l'utilizzo di una porta addizionale è avvenuto nel 23% dei casi, con un tasso di conversione del 20.8% (15.8% a “reduced port laparoscopy”, 4% a laparoscopia e 1% a chirurgia open). La LESS-RN è stata portata a termine in tutti i casi con un tasso di complicanze del 12.1%, del tutto comparabile ai dati di letteratura (13, 14, 17, 18). Il corto follow-up non permette di dare risposte sulla sicurezza oncologica e lo scopo iniziale di questo lavoro era peraltro incentrato sui risultati chirurgici iniziali.…”
Section: Discussioneunclassified
“…Negli ultimi anni molti lavori hanno dimostrato l'efficacia e la sicurezza dell'approccio LESS in ambito urologico (2, 519).…”
Section: Introduzioneunclassified