2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382011000100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early removal of nasogastric tube is beneficial for patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion

Abstract: Purpose: Examine the beneficial effect of early nasogastric tube (NGT) removal in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. Patients and Methods: 43 consecutive patients underwent radical cystectomy with urinary diversion and were randomized into 2 groups. In the intervention group (n = 22), the NGT was removed 12 hours after the operation. Comparatively, in the control group (n = 21), the NGT remained in place until the appearance of the first flatus. The appearance of ileus, patient ambu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…238 In this study, early removal (12 hours after the operation) was not correlated with ileus and was associated with improved patient comfort and earlier ambulation compared to standard removal of the tube after first flatus. The recommendation is also supported by a meta-analysis of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, in which postoperative nasogastric intubation was associated with more postoperative complications and no benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…238 In this study, early removal (12 hours after the operation) was not correlated with ileus and was associated with improved patient comfort and earlier ambulation compared to standard removal of the tube after first flatus. The recommendation is also supported by a meta-analysis of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, in which postoperative nasogastric intubation was associated with more postoperative complications and no benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…No significant differences were identified between cohort and control group in regards to first canalization (4 versus 5 days, p = 0·16) (Cerruto et al ., ). Advantages in comfort can be observed, because patients prefer in the 100% of cases NGT removal (Adamakis et al ., ; Cerruto et al ., ).…”
Section: Impact Of Early Oral Nutrition On Post‐operative Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The late return of bowel function is considered the first obstacle to the discharge of patients after RC with urinary diversion (Donat et al, 1999). This is, then, the most common cause of prolonged hospital stay with the following correlated increments in costs (Adamakis et al, 2011). Considering the importance of POI development as a post-operative complication and its consequences such as the increase in hospital stay, costs and late recovery of oral nutrition, studies analysing the NGT use to understand if it decreases the incidence of POI, have been analysed (Inman et al, 2003;Park et al, 2005;De Vries et al, 2012).…”
Section: Bowel Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance of NGT following cystectomy does not prevent ileus or other complication yet contributes to patient discomfort. [29][30][31] Therefore, early NG tube removal or avoidance of NG placement in association with radical cystectomy should be standard.…”
Section: Evidence-based Components Of Eras In Radical Cystectomymentioning
confidence: 99%