2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382003000200012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulbar urethroplasty using the dorsal approach: current techniques

Abstract: Introduction: The use of flaps or grafts is mandatory in patients with longer and complex strictures. In 1995-96 we described a new dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty. Over time, our original technique was better defined and changed. Now this procedure (also named Barbagli technique) has been greeted with a fair amount of enthusiasm in Europe and in the United States.Surgical Technique: The patient is placed in normal lithotomy position, and a midline perineoscrotal incision is made. The bulbar urethra is then f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…93,94 Proponents of dorsal grafting, on the other hand, argue that the corpus spongiosum provides greater mechanical support for dorsal onlay and, therefore, a reduced risk of diverticula formation, as well as offering a larger calibre of reconstructed urethra and the opportunity for neovascularization. 95 Several studies have shown similar success rates for dorsal and ventral onlay grafting, 93,94,96103 ranging from 84–100%. 68,104106 …”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…93,94 Proponents of dorsal grafting, on the other hand, argue that the corpus spongiosum provides greater mechanical support for dorsal onlay and, therefore, a reduced risk of diverticula formation, as well as offering a larger calibre of reconstructed urethra and the opportunity for neovascularization. 95 Several studies have shown similar success rates for dorsal and ventral onlay grafting, 93,94,96103 ranging from 84–100%. 68,104106 …”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, the width of the lip (maximal dimension, 1 ϫ 4 cm), unlike the buccal mucosa (maximal dimension, 3 ϫ 5.5 cm), limits the size of the graft. [1,37,38] …”
Section: Buccal and Labial Mucosaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reconstruct significant parts of the penis itself musculocutaneous flaps are needed [62]. For reconstruction of urethral defects full-thickness skin grafts may show poor results, whereas buccal mucosa has been used with good results [75,76].…”
Section: Perineo-genital Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%