Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with a single port platform: current and future perspectives of a referral center

Moschovas, Marcio Covas; Corder, Cathy; Patel, Vipul

doi:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2022.9978

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

(7 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, we believe that the current generation SP is not a robot to replace the multiport Xi but to complement its use in patients who are not candidates for the multiport approach, such as patients with ileostomy, colostomy, penile prosthesis with reservoir, kidney transplants, and other intra-abdominal obstacles. 27 Recently, some authors have described the transvesical access that can further expand the use of SP in these patients with a hostile abdomen.. 20,21,28 However, the functional and oncological results of this technique are still under discussion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison between intra- and postoperative outcomes of the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi robotic platforms in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe new SP robot incorporates a single trocar that houses a exible camera and three bi-articulated arms, which minimizes the number of incisions needed to assess the surgical site, allowing for a less invasive procedure. ObjectivesTo compare the postoperative pain scale and outcomes in patients with similar demographic characteristics undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with SP and Xi robots. Material and MethodsOne hundred consecutive patients undergoing RARP with the SP robot were matched, using a propensity score (PS), with 100 patients from a cohort of 1757 who were operated on with the da Vinci Xi from June 2019 to January 2021. We described and compared the perioperative pain scores and outcomes of both groups. ResultsThe SP group had less blood loss (50cc vs. 62.5cc, P < 0.001) and longer operative time (114 min. vs. 94 min, P < 0.001). The only period we could show a difference in postoperative pain scores was 6 hours after surgery, with a small advantage for the SP (2 vs. 2.5, P < 0.001). Both groups had satisfactory postoperative continence recovery, 91% vs. 90% for the SP and Xi, respectively. The groups had a mean follow-up of 24.5 and 22 months for SP and Xi, respectively. The tumor stage and percentage of positive surgical margins were similar between groups (15% vs. 15%, P = 1). ConclusionPatients undergoing RARP with the SP had longer operative times with less blood loss than the Xi. However, despite the lower number of abdominal incisions on the SP, the groups had similar intraoperative performance, and we were unable to demonstrate clinically signi cant differences in postoperative pain scores between the groups 6, 12, and 18 hours after surgery.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison between intra- and postoperative outcomes of the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi robotic platforms in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparison between intra and postoperative outcomes of the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi robotic platforms in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

Moschovas¹,

Loy²,

Patel³

et al. 2023

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The new SP robot incorporates a single trocar that houses a flexible camera and three bi-articulated arms, which minimizes the number of incisions needed to assess the surgical site, allowing for a less invasive procedure. Objectives To compare the postoperative pain scale and outcomes in patients with similar demographic characteristics undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with SP and Xi robots. Material and Methods One hundred consecutive patients undergoing RARP with the SP robot were matched, using a propensity score (PS), with 100 patients from a cohort of 1757 who were operated on with the da Vinci Xi from June 2019 to January 2021. We described and compared the perioperative pain scores and outcomes of both groups. Results The SP group had less blood loss (50cc vs. 62.5cc, P < 0.001) and longer operative time (114 min. vs. 94 min, P < 0.001). The only period we could show a difference in postoperative pain scores was 6 hours after surgery, with a small advantage for the SP (2 vs. 2.5, P < 0.001). Both groups had satisfactory postoperative continence recovery, 91% vs. 90% for the SP and Xi, respectively. The groups had a mean follow-up of 24.5 and 22 months for SP and Xi, respectively. The tumor stage and percentage of positive surgical margins were similar between groups (15% vs. 15%, P = 1). Conclusion Patients undergoing RARP with the SP had longer operative times with less blood loss than the Xi. However, despite the lower number of abdominal incisions on the SP, the groups had similar intraoperative performance, and we were unable to demonstrate clinically significant differences in postoperative pain scores between the groups 6, 12, and 18 hours after surgery.

show abstract

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with a single port platform: current and future perspectives of a referral center

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

Comparison between intra- and postoperative outcomes of the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi robotic platforms in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

Comparison between intra- and postoperative outcomes of the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi robotic platforms in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

Comparison between intra and postoperative outcomes of the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi robotic platforms in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About