Re: Long term outcomes of one-stage augmentation anterior urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

To the editor,Authors reviewed the current literature on augmentation anterior urethroplasty choosing for a detailed analysis of large groups of patients from leading centres in which long-term postoperative observation time is performed. They hypothesized that good long-term results are far below the commonly quoted 85%. In conclusion, the authors stated that the success of augmentation urethroplasty in the long-term (after more than 100 months of follow-up) appears to keep deteriorating (1). Very exact statistics supported authors` opinion that augmentation urethroplasty has worst than expected long term results (1). This important publication reminded us from the beginning of 21 century (2-4) when there were descriptions of stricture recurrence rate after buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty (BMGU) done for urethral stricture (US) that increased every 5 years from the operation, reaching 30% or even more 15 years after the operation. Those publications stimulated us to think about finding the cause of deterioration in so many patients with a long-term follow-up and to think about a treatment for that complication. In all patients who were sent to our Department with re-stricture after operations for US done elsewhere, hard scars along penile urethra could be palpated. We came to the conclusion that a treatment to decrease scar formation may be a solution for US recurrence. It seemed to us reasonable to try to prevent those complications actively instead of using "watch and see" passive method of postoperative observation and waiting whether recurrence of US appears or not. That is why in 2010 in a prospective study we introduced a calibration (not dilatation) of urethra with anti-scar gel as a preventive method for stricture recurrence (5). We began to act actively during the time of scar remodelling which starts early in postoperative time and is followed by scar contraction, the main cause -, as we hypothesized, -of US recurrence. We used only calibrations: we introduced dilator the same size as the actual inner size of urethra. That excluded the possibility of urethral injury, which may occur during dilatations. All patients described in our paper had had many urethral instrumentations such as dilatations and endoscopic incisions and reoperations for US. We decided to perform BMGU and 5 weeks later, after internal urethral caliber was measured (by calibrator) we started calibrations with anti-scar gel performed by patients themselves (after teaching them how to disinfect calibrators and to perform self-calibration) under our supervision (usually every six weeks in the first year after operation). We are convinced that the best results of that treatment can be obtained during early remodelling phase of postoperative wound healing in which anti-scar gel can prevent fibrosis and in consequence prevent scar contracture. In our publication, phases of wound healing are described as well as action of anti-scar gel, which may