2020
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.04.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic slings in the treatment of urinary incontinence: lessons learned and future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Nonetheless, mesh-related adverse events are associated with the midurethral sling. 22,23 In response to surgical complications involving the use of transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) issued a safety communication in 2011 24 and, since April 16, 2019, has banned the production and sale of transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. 25 By early 2015, over 70,000 women in the US had filed lawsuits alleging complications associated with transvaginal mesh used for both SUI and pelvic organ prolapse surgical procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Nonetheless, mesh-related adverse events are associated with the midurethral sling. 22,23 In response to surgical complications involving the use of transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) issued a safety communication in 2011 24 and, since April 16, 2019, has banned the production and sale of transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. 25 By early 2015, over 70,000 women in the US had filed lawsuits alleging complications associated with transvaginal mesh used for both SUI and pelvic organ prolapse surgical procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%