2017
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2015.0436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot - assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular tumor

Abstract: _______________________________________________________________________________________Introduction and objective: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is indicated for patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) with residual disease after chemotherapy. Although the gold standard approach is still the open surgery, few cases of robot-assisted laparoscopic RPLND have been described. Herein, we aim to present the surgical technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic RPLND. Patient and method: A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, oncologic outcomes do not seem to be compromised by the minimally invasive technique. Also, the node yield, which usually reflects the effectiveness of oncologic surgery, presented a weighted mean of 22.15 nodes in our review and was comparable with recent publications on the O-RPLND series that reported a median 28 [ [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] ] nodes removed [ 41 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of note, oncologic outcomes do not seem to be compromised by the minimally invasive technique. Also, the node yield, which usually reflects the effectiveness of oncologic surgery, presented a weighted mean of 22.15 nodes in our review and was comparable with recent publications on the O-RPLND series that reported a median 28 [ [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] ] nodes removed [ 41 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As a result, multiple series of R-RPLND have been successfully reported recently in multiple experienced centers around the world, showing the potential of this surgical approach to increase the number of well-trained surgeons performing minimally invasive RPLND [ 10 , 11 , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] ]. Even challenging cases as bulky CS III disease with concomitant inferior vena cava thrombectomy for metastatic GCT have already been managed successfully with a robotic approach by high-volume surgeons [ [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] ]. With regards to patient positioning, the initial series described the R-RPLND approach with the patient in flank position and trocar placement and docking similar to a partial nephrectomy [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 37 studies [7,21–56] were included. Of these, 12 studies [7,21,23–25,28–32,34,35] described patients who underwent primary R‐RPLND only, 16 [38–53] described patients who underwent post‐chemotherapy R‐RPLND only, and six [22,26,27,33,36,37] included patients who underwent R‐RPLND in either of these settings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 43 ] However, RA-RPLND is mostly supported by case reports and small retrospective series. [ 44 ] In a review of retrospective studies (116 patients) by Tselos et al .,[ 38 ] the authors found similar outcomes as the L-RPLND. Median LN yield was 22.3 with an overall positivity rate of 26% and complication rate of 8%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%