2015
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2015.02.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy?: Opinion: NO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent technological advances in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) including development of digital ureteroscopes and high-power lithotripsy generators result in better stone free rates (SFR) while offering less morbidity to patients, hence broadening the indications of this technique, including large and complex stones ( 4 , 5 ). Better outcomes translate into an increasing number of RIRS worldwide ( 6 ), but bring about the question: will RIRS, ultimately, extinguish PCNL as the main surgical treatment for large stones?…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent technological advances in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) including development of digital ureteroscopes and high-power lithotripsy generators result in better stone free rates (SFR) while offering less morbidity to patients, hence broadening the indications of this technique, including large and complex stones ( 4 , 5 ). Better outcomes translate into an increasing number of RIRS worldwide ( 6 ), but bring about the question: will RIRS, ultimately, extinguish PCNL as the main surgical treatment for large stones?…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%