“…From histopathologic point of view, the use of silk suture material in the current study coincided with many researchers as the silk was ordinarily used because it was inexpensive, easily sterilized, provided stronger wound closure, and evoked minimal inflammatory cellular reaction with rare tendency of developing delayed inflammation ( Chung, Kim, Kim, Yun & Hong, 2006 ; Cutler & Dunphy, 1941 ; Kikuchi et al., 2012 ). Accordingly, minimal pathologic changes could be observed in the current study, like foreign body granuloma around the silk material without evidence of suppuration ( Chung et al., 2006 ; Ollivere, Bosman, Bearcroft & Robinson, 2014 ; Takahara et al., 2013 ), in addition to presence of degenerated macrophages and multinucleated phagocytic giant cells of histiocytic origin engulfing the sutured material, and they were encircled by a dense wall of fibrous connective tissue ( Secil, Mungan & Yorukoglu, 2015 ). This fibrous tunnel around the silk might prevent both of the tongue from cupping and self-suckling even after complete lysis of the silk.…”