2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-54492012000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endolaser venoso: estudo série de casos

Abstract: Objective: To report our 14-month experience comparing the use of 980 nm laser with axial fiber with 1,470 nm laser with radial fiber. Methods: Charts from 215 patients were reviewed in order to compare the results of the use of 980 nm diode laser with axial fiber and 1,470 nm diode laser with radial fiber, with and without intumescent infiltration respectively, analyzing the percentage of saphenous vein occlusion and complications. Results: A total of 294 legs of 215 patients were treated. Among them, 141 cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also concluded that there was no significant difference in outcomes between patients treated with different wavelengths. 11 Bueno et al 12 published a case series report showing that use of 1470-nm laser is a good method for treating saphenous veins, with results similar to those obtained with 980-nm laser treatment, but with lower energy densities and power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…They also concluded that there was no significant difference in outcomes between patients treated with different wavelengths. 11 Bueno et al 12 published a case series report showing that use of 1470-nm laser is a good method for treating saphenous veins, with results similar to those obtained with 980-nm laser treatment, but with lower energy densities and power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…5 Araujo et al 6 also studied EVLT using the 1470 nm wavelength, showing that by employing a low energy density the incidence of complications could be reduced without significantly impacting the clinical results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%