2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1676-56482003000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial reporting on the internet: the portuguese case

Abstract: Due to recent developments in information technologies, Portuguese companies are using the Internet to disclose accounting information through their Web sites. After presenting the advantages and eventual risks of this form of financial reporting and literature review, the Web sites of Portuguese listed companies were examined throughout March 2000 to February 2001, to determine which companies present financial information and whether the information provided is summarised, identical to the paper version of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings in relation to the increasing use of the Internet for financial reporting are reported by Lymer (1997) and Craven and Marston (1999) in the UK context2, Lymer and Tallberg (1997) for corporations in Finland, Pirchegger and Wagenhofer (1999) for Austria, Brennan and Hourigan (2000) for Ireland, Rodrigues and Menezes (2001) for Portugal, Lybaert (2002) for the Netherlands, Hassen et al (2000) for Malaysia, Marston and Wu (2001) for Japan, Oyelere et a1 (2000) for in New Zealand, while Gowthrope and hensive as those in the US (EDGAR) and Canada (SEDAR). For example, companies in Australia cannot lodge their annual reports electronically, as is already possible in the US and Canada.…”
Section: In Internet Reportingsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar findings in relation to the increasing use of the Internet for financial reporting are reported by Lymer (1997) and Craven and Marston (1999) in the UK context2, Lymer and Tallberg (1997) for corporations in Finland, Pirchegger and Wagenhofer (1999) for Austria, Brennan and Hourigan (2000) for Ireland, Rodrigues and Menezes (2001) for Portugal, Lybaert (2002) for the Netherlands, Hassen et al (2000) for Malaysia, Marston and Wu (2001) for Japan, Oyelere et a1 (2000) for in New Zealand, while Gowthrope and hensive as those in the US (EDGAR) and Canada (SEDAR). For example, companies in Australia cannot lodge their annual reports electronically, as is already possible in the US and Canada.…”
Section: In Internet Reportingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These include company size, which appears to be positively associated with disclosure on the Interneta3 Another influence is spread of ownership (Oyelere et a1 2000). However, industrial grouping does not seem to be associated with reporting on the Internet (Craven and Marston 1999, Lymer et a1 1999, Rodrigues and Menezes 2001; neither does liquidity, at least in the case of New Zealand (Oyelere et a1 2000).…”
Section: In Internet Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model tested took on the following shape: We built some hypotheses and highlighted the independent variables thanks to a literature review about the determinants of internet financial disclosure (Craven & Marston, 1999;Skaife, Johnstone, & Warfield, 1999;Ho & Wong, 2001;Larran & Giner, 2002;Bonson & Escobar, 2002;Debreceny, Gray, & Rahman, 2002;Ettredge, Richardson, & Scholz, 2002;Marston, 2003;Oyelere et al, 2003;Rodriguez & Menezes, 2003;Xiao et al, 2004;Mendes-Da-Silva & Christensen, 2004;Laswad, Fisher, & Oyelere, 2005;Debreceny & Rahman, 2005;Paturel et al, 2006;Bollen, Hassink, & Bozic, 2006;Andrikopoulos & Diakidis, 2007;Almilia, 2009a;2009b;Oxibar, 2010). Table 4 describes how the independent variables are measured.…”
Section: Linear Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We made interviews (Kaufmann, 1996;Gavard-Perret, Gotteland, Haon, & Jolibert, 2008;Savoie-Zajc, 2009) and we analyzed them referring to the principle of thematic analysis (Paillé & Mucchielli, 2008;Corbin & Strauss, 2008). It means that we did not analyze the speech itself but the real-life experience of managers.…”
Section: Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%