2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-70772007000200008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aplicación de las medidas clásicas de performance en los fondos de inversión brasileños de renta variables

Abstract: En este estudio realizamos una aplicación de las medidas clásicas de performance de carteras y sus respectivas alternativas de coherencia absoluta con los datos de las rentabilidades mensuales de los fondos de inversión brasileños de renta variable en el período comprendido entre julio/2003 a julio/2005. Con el objetivo de desarrollar este estudio utilizamos el análisis multivariante para clasificar los fondos conforme sus caracteristicas de volatilidad así como identificar el conjunto de fondos con mayores va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Franz and Figueiredo (2003) found no evidence of market timing ability in 29 Brazilian mutual stock funds from 1995 to 2000. Barbosa and Sarto (2007) studied a sample of nine ANBID categories (currently ANBIMA) of Brazilian investment funds, based on the performance measures of Treynor (1965), Sharpe (1966), and Jensen (1968), verifying that the management classification is accompanied by strong similarities, according to different measures.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Franz and Figueiredo (2003) found no evidence of market timing ability in 29 Brazilian mutual stock funds from 1995 to 2000. Barbosa and Sarto (2007) studied a sample of nine ANBID categories (currently ANBIMA) of Brazilian investment funds, based on the performance measures of Treynor (1965), Sharpe (1966), and Jensen (1968), verifying that the management classification is accompanied by strong similarities, according to different measures.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 86%