2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842012000300011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the littoral fish assemblage in an impounded tributary: the effects of macrophytes presence (subtropical region, Brazil)

Abstract: To evaluate the effects of macrophytes presence in the structure of littoral fish assemblages in the littoral zone, monthly samples were collected from September, 2006 to August, 2007 in an impounded tributary of the Itá Reservoir, the Fragosos River, located in the Upper Uruguay River Basin. Fish were collected using a beach seine and sampling was conducted in the littoral zone inside a macrophyte stand and in an area with no macrophytes. A total of 5,191 fish were captured during the study period. Fish assem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of taxa we found, at least 20 species, is comparable to other studies that also searched for fish inside macrophyte banks in Brazilian rivers and reservoirs, which varied between 22 to 26 species, but with a much higher sampling efforts -5 to 50 times more captures (Pelicice et al, 2008;Dibble & Pelicice, 2010;Hermes-Silva & Zaniboni-Filho, 2012). In terms of composition, it is also important to mention that we sampled fish species of all orders occurring in this river (Oliveira et al, 2016;Brambilla et al, 2019;Diniz et al, 2019), namely Characiformes, Siluriformes, Gymnotiformes, Synbranchiformes and Cichliformes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of taxa we found, at least 20 species, is comparable to other studies that also searched for fish inside macrophyte banks in Brazilian rivers and reservoirs, which varied between 22 to 26 species, but with a much higher sampling efforts -5 to 50 times more captures (Pelicice et al, 2008;Dibble & Pelicice, 2010;Hermes-Silva & Zaniboni-Filho, 2012). In terms of composition, it is also important to mention that we sampled fish species of all orders occurring in this river (Oliveira et al, 2016;Brambilla et al, 2019;Diniz et al, 2019), namely Characiformes, Siluriformes, Gymnotiformes, Synbranchiformes and Cichliformes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The higher abundance of individuals of the Synbranchidae family in the macrophyte banks, as well as the presence of the order Gymnotiformes, can be explained by the adaptations they have such as the elongated body shape, easily camouflaged between plants, insectivorous feeding behavior, and tolerance to low oxygen concentrations (Henderson & Hamilton, 1995;Crampton & Hopkins, 2005;Bulla et al, 2011). In case of Gymnotiformes, an intensive study of Hermes-Silva & Zaniboni-Filho (2012), comparing the ichthyofauna of macrophyte and non-macrophyte areas, found the species Gymnotus carapo only inside macrophyte banks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another process strongly influenced by the formation of reservoirs and that deserves attention in the study of the Itá UHE is the development of aquatic macrophytes Pelicice et al, 2008;Hermes-Silva and Zaniboni-Filho, 2012). Among the main effects of the presence of macrophytes is the supply of abundant food for herbivorous species, such as S. nasutus (Andrade and Braga, 2005), a fish that totaled the highest biomass captured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the downstream environment has a smaller area compared to the reservoir. According to Hermes-Silva and Zaniboni (2012), the presence of macrophytes provides different microhabitats that act as a refuge from predators as well as feeding sites. It is worth noting that gillnets were not used downstream because it is a wading area habitat.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%