2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842011000300002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential pollinators of Comolia ovalifolia DC Triana (Melastomataceae) and Chamaecrista ramosa (Vog.) H.S. Irwin and Barneby var. ramosa (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae), in restinga, Bahia, Brazil

Abstract: Comolia ovalifolia DC Triana (Melastomataceae) and Chamaecrista ramosa (Vog.) H.S. Irwin and Barneby var. ramosa (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae) are tropical plant species found in restinga (herbaceous-shrubby, sandy costal ecosystems). They have flowers with poricidal anthers and are pollinated by bees. The study sought to analyse potential pollinators of both plants during visits to their flowers in a restinga area in Bahia. The flowering displayed by both species was considered continuous and long duration, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the low contribution of secondary nectar robbers to the structural divergences between Centrosema pollination systems (i.e., 4% dissimilarity), the Centridini bees deserve attention because of the distinctive roles of "cheaters"on structuring flower-visitor webs (Genini et al, 2010). Centridini is one of the most abundant bee group in tropical coastal restinga and sand dunes (Ramalho & Silva, 2002;Viana & Kleinert, 2006;Oliveira-Rebouças & Gimenes, 2011;Rosa & Ramalho, 2011), and therefore its low abundance on Centrosema flowers would not sustain the hypothesis of random interactions proportional to abundances in the habitat (Vázquez, 2005;Vázquez & Aizen, 2004). Behaving as secondary nectar robbers in Centrosema flowers is probably a response of Centridini bees to a contingent relationship: encounters facilitated by the abundance of these bees in the habitat (Ramalho & Silva, 2002;Rosa & Ramalho, 2011) and by the long flowering periods of Centrosema species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the low contribution of secondary nectar robbers to the structural divergences between Centrosema pollination systems (i.e., 4% dissimilarity), the Centridini bees deserve attention because of the distinctive roles of "cheaters"on structuring flower-visitor webs (Genini et al, 2010). Centridini is one of the most abundant bee group in tropical coastal restinga and sand dunes (Ramalho & Silva, 2002;Viana & Kleinert, 2006;Oliveira-Rebouças & Gimenes, 2011;Rosa & Ramalho, 2011), and therefore its low abundance on Centrosema flowers would not sustain the hypothesis of random interactions proportional to abundances in the habitat (Vázquez, 2005;Vázquez & Aizen, 2004). Behaving as secondary nectar robbers in Centrosema flowers is probably a response of Centridini bees to a contingent relationship: encounters facilitated by the abundance of these bees in the habitat (Ramalho & Silva, 2002;Rosa & Ramalho, 2011) and by the long flowering periods of Centrosema species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, each plant species could be more attractive to a different sub-set of shared pollinators, partitioning the pollination services by having different 'major' and 'minor' pollinator species (e.g. Flanagan et al, 2011;Oliveira-Rebouças and Gimenes, 2011). Finally, the plants could facilitate one another by increasing the attractiveness of the general area, thereby increasing the total number of pollinators in the area and increasing the reproductive success of both species, despite sharing pollinators (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequentemente, a eficiência da polinização e o posterior sucesso reprodutivo aumentam como já visto em outros estudos (Schmitt 1983, Robertson 1992, Klinkhamer & de Jong 1993, Schoonhoven et al, 2005 Características corporais e as limitações fisiológicas dos visitantes florais podem gerar padrões de visitação condicionados a fatores como luminosidade e temperatura (Ramalho et al 1991). De acordo com Oliveira-Rebouças & Gimenes (2011), as atividades de abelhas em algumas espécies de plantas estão associadas a intensidade luminosa assim também como a ação conjunta de fatores como temperatura, umidade relativa, que podem aumentar a atração de maior número de abelhas para as flores. Assim como as abelhas, os Lepidópteros apresentam alta sensibilidade a variações meteorológicas, principalmente os de pequeno porte encontrados no estudo, sendo encontrados forrageando somente no final das manhãs, das 10:00 horas até as 11:00 horas, em períodos tanto de altas temperaturas e radiação solar, mas com baixa umidade relativa.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified